What's new

ASUS RT-BE92U

  • Thread starter Deleted member 77025
  • Start date
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Hasn't dual WAN been a regular hit or miss function with Asus routers? I remember seeing problems mentioned with it on other models as well. It's been a while though.
Dual wan on my ax88u has been rock solid but on my ac88u it was definitely hit or miss for most of the time I was using it until Asus got it right. The biggest issue was fall back which almost never worked until I manually disconnected the 2nd ISP. The be92u not only stuck on the 2nd ISP but throughput was like 1200 baud dial up. :eek: I did submit a report to Asus before I reset and returned them.
 
Dual wan on my ax88u has been rock solid but on my ac88u it was definitely hit or miss for most of the time I was using it until Asus got it right. The biggest issue was fall back which almost never worked until I manually disconnected the 2nd ISP. The be92u not only stuck on the 2nd ISP but throughput was like 1200 baud dial up. :eek: I did submit a report to Asus before I reset and returned them.
I was going to test my iPhone as a 4G source, but I decided to pass because I don't have good enough signal in the apartment with the phone to make it worth it. Calls work fine, and I've set up WiFi Calling, but for data when it gave me any kind of speed test results it was about 37 Mbps down and 0.2Mbps up. So, for running the whole network, I don't think that would go very far. I do have 5G on my plan but there again, my I have to change locations before the phone changes to 5G instead of using LTE.
 
I'm going to keep an eye out for the 98 pro going on sale again. I was eying it up about 4 weeks ago when it was down to $700 but I think it will go lower soon since its almost a year old now. If only another company would offer tri or quad band wifi 7 with dual wan and two or more 10gb ports.

If you're interested in TP-Link, they have several wifi-7 routers, at least one of which has a couple of 10Gb ports. Worth a look.
 
I was going to test my iPhone as a 4G source, but I decided to pass because I don't have good enough signal in the apartment with the phone to make it worth it. Calls work fine, and I've set up WiFi Calling, but for data when it gave me any kind of speed test results it was about 37 Mbps down and 0.2Mbps up. So, for running the whole network, I don't think that would go very far. I do have 5G on my plan but there again, my I have to change locations before the phone changes to 5G instead of using LTE.
My primary is xfinity 943mbps at my location and my secondary is at&t vdsl so there's a huge difference in performance between the two. I periodically telework and need redundancy because from time to time somebody digs without calling 411 beforehand severing optical trunks killing xfinity for hours on end. I could plug my phone into the usb slot as I do get around 800mbps here but for productivity work vdsl is fine.
 
I was experimenting with the Dual WAN feature and something got messed up really bad in the settings file. I had to take it back to factory and reconfigure from scratch. The AX92 it is replacing never got this bad when configuring Dual WAN.

Best to steer clear of this functionality for now.
Not a deal breaker for me, so I am going to ride out the storm until the next update.
 
I was experimenting with the Dual WAN feature and something got messed up really bad in the settings file. I had to take it back to factory and reconfigure from scratch. The AX92 it is replacing never got this bad when configuring Dual WAN.

Best to steer clear of this functionality for now.
Not a deal breaker for me, so I am going to ride out the storm until the next update.
My root cause of my stability issues was a configuration error on my part. I had put everything on one MLO SSID and forgot I had “smart” devices that are only stable with WPA2. The resulting churning was consuming processing resources. So I pulled the 2.4GHz network out of the MLO and put it on a separate SSID with WPA2. I’ll get back to the Dual Wan testing at a later date.
 
My root cause of my stability issues was a configuration error on my part. I had put everything on one MLO SSID and forgot I had “smart” devices that are only stable with WPA2. The resulting churning was consuming processing resources. So I pulled the 2.4GHz network out of the MLO and put it on a separate SSID with WPA2. I’ll get back to the Dual Wan testing at a later date.
My current setup is 3 separate SSIDs for 2.4, 5, and 6GHz. Don't have any WiFi 7 devices yet, so haven't set up MLO for now. I have set up 2 iOT networks under network. 1 for my lights, and one for the smart plugs. Everything seems to play nice with this setup for me. Currently I don't need Dual WAN, but did have issues with the default settings of WAN Auto detection, so manually set the port I want used. The only iOT devices on my main 2.4 and 5G networks are the smart speakers. Amazon Alexa (Echos) and Google nest audio. They don't have the issues the lights have with being kicked off and needing to be isolated for stability, otherwise I'd have everything on the main network as they my devices have features that only work if they can commnicate with the app directly on the main network in terms of setup and specific features. For cloud only control they work fine on an isolated guest network since I've already paired them.
 
I am maxing out my Mediacom Gigabit cable internet connection using MLO (comparing device vs. router Speedtest). So IDK where it will top out on speed.

Once you have WiFi 7 clients, tie the 5&6 GHz radios to the same SSID and leave the 2.4 radio as is for the WPA2 “smart” device support.
 
I am maxing out my Mediacom Gigabit cable internet connection using MLO (comparing device vs. router Speedtest). So IDK where it will top out on speed.

Once you have WiFi 7 clients, tie the 5&6 GHz radios to the same SSID and leave the 2.4 radio as is for the WPA2 “smart” device support.
I was going to ask about that. Can MLO do 5 and 6 Ghz only and have a separate SSD for 2.4? Also can I keep my 3 Separate SSiDs and add a separate MLO one ?
 
I was going to ask about that. Can MLO do 5 and 6 Ghz only and have a separate SSD for 2.4? Also can I keep my 3 Separate SSiDs and add a separate MLO one ?
1) Not if you try to configure it via Wireless|MLO. Enable MLO at Wireless|MLO and configure a SSID for MLO and 5/6GHz on the Network tab.
2) I haven’t tried that yet. I’ll let you know when I get some time to test it out.
 
1) Not if you try to configure it via Wireless|MLO. Enable MLO at Wireless|MLO and configure a SSID for MLO and 5/6GHz on the Network tab.
2) I haven’t tried that yet. I’ll let you know when I get some time to test it out.
Thanks will keep it in mind.
 
So I went a couple of days without reboot. The smart devices would have slow or no response. So I reset to factory and used the setup wizard to rebuild the main MLO network triband and the IoT network. Same behavior after a couple of days. So I put in a daily 3AM reboot until the next firmware update comes out.
 
So daily reboot doesn’t help. I had turned on MLO Fronthaul for Clients, so I turned it back off. No noted speed impact on the WiFi7 devices (still pegging my 1gig internet connection). Lets see if this helps stability over time.
 
Had a lot of trouble. Factory reset plus no MLO Fronthaul seems to have done the trick; thanks!

I do have a quick, possibly stupid, question.

I have two SSIDs configured. "Network A" uses 2.4GHz and "Network B" uses 5GHz and 6GHz with Smart Connect / Band Steering. If I go to the Network tab in the Web interface and try to check the box to add the 2.4GHz band to Network B, it says doing so will delete Network A entirely.

Why? Since the SSIDs are distinct, why can't both networks use the 2.4GHz band?
 
IDK. I got around something like this by making the 2.4 only network an IoT network.
You will likely have to delete Network A, add the 2.4 radio to Network B, then recreate Network A as an IoT or Guest network and configure it to use only the 2.4 radio.
 
I might try that.

Can I configure the guest SSID so that it is on the same subnet as the main SSID and without any isolation? (I am trying to cater to both modern and legacy devices that might want to talk to each other. I am aware of the security implications.)
 
Can I configure the guest SSID so that it is on the same subnet as the main SSID and without any isolation?

What's the point of doing this? Just use single SSID/pass for all your clients.
 
Then use the main 2.4GHz network/SSID for your older clients. Why additional Guest Network?
 

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top