SunrisePro
Regular Contributor
First, I'm happy to have found SNB - this is the first time in years of router shopping that I've had so much info to guide me. Our current router (a Netgear R6100) craps out 1-2x a day so we're looking for a reliable replacement.
Here's our needs, Part 1: due to a Lenovo laptop, we have to use a 2.4ghz bgn network (replacing the laptop is not an option). All laptops and tablets need to be on the same networks for the kids & their friends to play local games. We have multiple streams of Netflix and/or Youtube running all day long, with the kids playing Minecraft online as well. We can have up to 6 devices in use at a time.
Part 2 is that we've got a hard drive connected to our current router as a household file server and for media playback on our smart tv. The hard drive is fairly recent; we'd been using Serviio or Plex to play files off one of the computers but it was never reliable. I thought it might be better to go from the router/USB-to-tv than laptop-router-to-tv.
Part 3 is that we are on Fios and I loathe their router. It's basically being used as a modem and it's network is hidden.
It seems like I need a combo of good 2.4ghz performance and storage performance.
I see that the R6100 (not sure why I chose it, could be that I didn't want to pay for the R6300 at the time) is a poor performer, with a Fat32 Read/Write at 10.5/7.8 and 2.4ghz throughput at 106. (I had never known these numbers even got measured until I found SNB; I'm guessing that the 2.4ghz throughput will help me compare).
Coming here from a Wirecutter article, I was looking at the TC-Link Archers and the Netgear R7000 (which I can get at Costco for $140, minus a usb port). I'm now surmising that USB 3.0 Fat32 read performance may be important for us but after the R6100 performance, we should be able to triple that at minimum.
The question is how fast does it need to be and how does 2.4ghz performance fit in? The R7000 seems to be the overall recommendation and it's fat32 read of 57 is waaaay better than what we have now - but maybe it's worth it to try the Linksys WRT1200 & it's fat32 read of 95?
otoh for 2.4ghz throughput the R7000 is 135 while the WRT1200 is 116. And in the review of the Linksys WRT1900 it notes that it does really well with reading off the USB while the network is in heavy use. My head is swimming - I know way more about routers than I ever wanted to know.
Budget-wise I'd prefer to keep it un $150 but if a $200 router means I won't be interrupted twice a day to reboot it, I'll go for that. If I'm leaning towards anything, it's the WRT1900 because it's the one review I read that noted that simultaneous wireless and storage performance was very good.
Here's our needs, Part 1: due to a Lenovo laptop, we have to use a 2.4ghz bgn network (replacing the laptop is not an option). All laptops and tablets need to be on the same networks for the kids & their friends to play local games. We have multiple streams of Netflix and/or Youtube running all day long, with the kids playing Minecraft online as well. We can have up to 6 devices in use at a time.
Part 2 is that we've got a hard drive connected to our current router as a household file server and for media playback on our smart tv. The hard drive is fairly recent; we'd been using Serviio or Plex to play files off one of the computers but it was never reliable. I thought it might be better to go from the router/USB-to-tv than laptop-router-to-tv.
Part 3 is that we are on Fios and I loathe their router. It's basically being used as a modem and it's network is hidden.
It seems like I need a combo of good 2.4ghz performance and storage performance.
I see that the R6100 (not sure why I chose it, could be that I didn't want to pay for the R6300 at the time) is a poor performer, with a Fat32 Read/Write at 10.5/7.8 and 2.4ghz throughput at 106. (I had never known these numbers even got measured until I found SNB; I'm guessing that the 2.4ghz throughput will help me compare).
Coming here from a Wirecutter article, I was looking at the TC-Link Archers and the Netgear R7000 (which I can get at Costco for $140, minus a usb port). I'm now surmising that USB 3.0 Fat32 read performance may be important for us but after the R6100 performance, we should be able to triple that at minimum.
The question is how fast does it need to be and how does 2.4ghz performance fit in? The R7000 seems to be the overall recommendation and it's fat32 read of 57 is waaaay better than what we have now - but maybe it's worth it to try the Linksys WRT1200 & it's fat32 read of 95?
otoh for 2.4ghz throughput the R7000 is 135 while the WRT1200 is 116. And in the review of the Linksys WRT1900 it notes that it does really well with reading off the USB while the network is in heavy use. My head is swimming - I know way more about routers than I ever wanted to know.
Budget-wise I'd prefer to keep it un $150 but if a $200 router means I won't be interrupted twice a day to reboot it, I'll go for that. If I'm leaning towards anything, it's the WRT1900 because it's the one review I read that noted that simultaneous wireless and storage performance was very good.
Last edited: