Menu
What's new
By:
Filters Better Search

Best and most optimal settings (Voxel & Kamoj)

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

pege63

pege63

Very Senior Member
If ONE want to use the R7800 as the main router, instead of the one from the ISP.

How should the settings be set, to be the best and most optimal for the router?

If someone don't know much about how they should be or what they do for/in the router?

The most important things are - privacy and safety.

Have fiber optic line in with Internet, IPTV, VOIP, services.

The reason for this, is to gather all the data, scripts, codes in one place so a beginner/newbie does not have to look in a lot of other places/posts.
 
Last edited:
DNS can be configured to use DNS over HTTPS, but not from the GUI. The AdGuard servers have the best performance for me where I live, so those are the ones I use. I configure the router to use the filtered ones, which blocks ads (and hopefully scams and malware) for every device on the network. However, I want to be able to control from my browser what sites get adblocked. Therefore, I configure my browser (Firefox) to use the non-filtered AdGuard servers and use uBlock Origin to block ads instead. I assume Chrome has a similar setting since Edge has it.

I do have a Pi-Hole set to act like a real DNS, but I don't bother with it since the AdGuard servers don't retain your history (they say) and work as well as the blocking in a Pi-Hole.

To restore the DNS settings after an upgrade, you'll need a USB thumb drive with a post-mount.sh bash script to make the mods. Here's mine:

Bash: 
#!/bin/sh

if [ ! -f "/root/firewall-start.sh" ]
then
  cp /tmp/mnt/$1/firewall-start.sh /root/.
fi

if [ ! -f "/root/.ssh/authorized_keys" ]
then
  mkdir -p /root/.ssh
  cp /tmp/mnt/$1/authorized_keys /root/.ssh/authorized_keys
fi


if [ ! -f "/overlay/etc/dnscrypt-proxy-2.toml " ]; then
  sed -i -r "s/^(server_names[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*).*/\1['adguard-dns-doh']/" /etc/dnscrypt-proxy-2.toml
fi

The first item in the script copies over an advanced firewall rule script that I need. The second is to restore my ssh keys so I can connect to the router without entering a password. The last one is what modifies the dnscrypt proxy to use AdGuard instead of the default ones.
 
On the router, disable anything you are not using (ReadyCloud, QoS, NG Downloader, Media Server, UPnP...)

As much as possible, use the router for routing and firewall only. Extra services (download, adblocking, media server, VPN, etc.) being set on dedicated external device (NAS, Odroid, Raspberry Pi or other).

For protection, only open ports (NAT) if you need it and for the services you host and should be accessible from WAN (like a webserver open to the public).
Also, if you feel comfortable with it, tweak and adapt your iptables rules; there are several threads here about that.
 
HELLO_wORLD said:
On the router, disable anything you are not using (ReadyCloud, QoS, NG Downloader, Media Server, UPnP...)

As much as possible, use the router for routing and firewall only. Extra services (download, adblocking, media server, VPN, etc.) being set on dedicated external device (NAS, Odroid, Raspberry Pi or other).

For protection, only open ports (NAT) if you need it and for the services you host and should be accessible from WAN (like a webserver open to the public).
Also, if you feel comfortable with it, tweak and adapt your iptables rules; there are several threads here about that.
Click to expand...

That's exactly how my R9000 is set up. Disabled everything i could, no open ports and I'm using a Raspberry Pi 4, w/pihole for ad-blocking, DHCP and unbound as recursive DNS server. Also a handful of iptables rules to force all traffic to the pihole.
 
Last edited:
foo man said:
That's exactly how my R9000 is set up. Disabled everything i could, no open ports and I'm using a Raspberry Pi 4, w/pihole for ad-blocking, DHCP and unbound as recursive DNS server. Also a handful of iptables rules to force all traffic to the pihole.
Click to expand...
Can you please specify what iprules are you using to achieve that? And how do I apply them
 
crowdme2 said:
Can you please specify what iprules are you using to achieve that? And how do I apply them
Click to expand...
Sorry haven't been around in a couple of days.
I have a Raspberry Pi4 with pihole running in my setup and I use a few methods to try and force all traffic to go there: for one, I use "block services" under the R9000's security settings to block ports 53 and 853 from all IP's EXCEPT my pihole's IP (192.168.1.2).
The iptable rules I use are to forward any requests from random devices going to googleDNS, cloudflare and openDNS, and force them to use my pihole instead. We have some devices in the house (alexa, roku. chromebook, TVs) that were trying to access google and cloudflare servers. I have a Nvidia Shield tv and I read somewhere that a user said his was constantly calling to the openDNS servers, so I added their addresses to my rules as well. I also added quad9's servers to the mix, well ...just because.
They look like this:

Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 8.8.8.8/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 8.8.4.4/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 1.1.1.1/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 1.0.0.1/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.9/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.10/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.11/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.112/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.10/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.11/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 208.67.222.222/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 208.67.220.220/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2

Excessive? Probably, but as far as I can tell, these are working as intended. Thanks to HELLO_wORLD for guidance with the rules. Hopefully he sees this post and can confirm they look ok, because to be honest ... I have no clue what I'm doing LOL

These rules work in conjunction with my raspberry pi/pihole, so unfortunately if you don't have a similar setup, then none of this is going to help you, sorry.
 
Last edited:
foo man said:
Sorry haven't been around in a couple of days.
I have a Raspberry Pi4 with pihole running in my setup and I use a few methods to try and force all traffic to go there: for one, I use "block services" under the R9000's security settings to block ports 53 and 853 from all IP's EXCEPT my pihole's IP (192.168.1.2).
The iptable rules I use are to forward any requests from random devices going to googleDNS, cloudflare and openDNS, and force them to use my pihole instead. We have some devices in the house (alexa, roku. chromebook, TVs) that were trying to access google and cloudflare servers. I have a Nvidia Shield tv and I read somewhere that a user said his was constantly calling to the openDNS servers, so I added their addresses to my rules as well. I also added quad9's servers to the mix, well ...just because.
They look like this:

Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 8.8.8.8/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 8.8.4.4/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 1.1.1.1/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 1.0.0.1/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.9/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.10/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 9.9.9.11/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.112/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.10/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 149.112.112.11/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 208.67.222.222/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -d 208.67.220.220/32 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2

Excessive? Probably, but as far as I can tell, these are working as intended. Thanks to HELLO_wORLD for guidance with the rules. Hopefully he sees this post and can confirm they look ok, because to be honest ... I have no clue what I'm doing LOL

These rules work in conjunction with my raspberry pi/pihole, so unfortunately if you don't have a similar setup, then none of this is going to help you, sorry.
Click to expand...
Yep, I see this post ;)
Rules look fine to me, and if it works, then you know it is fine :)
You probably could simplify them by detecting the port (53 for DNS).
Something like
Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p tcp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p udp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
This would redirect all DNS traffic from LAN to your PiHole, whatever the dns server.
 
Thanks man, I knew you would find a better way! Going to give that a try

Edit: implemented your change and working beautifully! Checking pihole logs I see all traffic being forwarded there. Much cleaner approach, thanks!
 
Last edited:
foo man said:
Thanks man, I knew you would find a better way! Going to give that a try

Edit: implemented your change and working beautifully! Checking pihole logs I see all traffic being forwarded there. Much cleaner approach, thanks!
Click to expand...
You are welcome :)
 
HELLO_wORLD said:
You probably could simplify them by detecting the port (53 for DNS).
Something like
Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p tcp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p udp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
This would redirect all DNS traffic from LAN to your PiHole, whatever the dns server.
Click to expand...

I use DNSCrypt2 pointing to the AdGuard filtered DNS. Could I replace the 192.168.1.2 with the IP address of the router to force DNS calls to other IP addresses to use the DNSCrypt DNS? Also, I assume any device configured to do DNS over HTTPS (like Firefox) can "override" this?
 
Sizzlechest said:
I use DNSCrypt2 pointing to the AdGuard filtered DNS. Could I replace the 192.168.1.2 with the IP address of the router to force DNS calls to other IP addresses to use the DNSCrypt DNS? Also, I assume any device configured to do DNS over HTTPS (like Firefox) can "override" this?
Click to expand...
Yes (LAN interface IP) and yes :)
 
HELLO_wORLD said:
On the router, disable anything you are not using (ReadyCloud, QoS, NG Downloader, Media Server, UPnP...)

As much as possible, use the router for routing and firewall only. Extra services (download, adblocking, media server, VPN, etc.) being set on dedicated external device (NAS, Odroid, Raspberry Pi or other).

For protection, only open ports (NAT) if you need it and for the services you host and should be accessible from WAN (like a webserver open to the public).
Also, if you feel comfortable with it, tweak and adapt your iptables rules; there are several threads here about that.
Click to expand...
Hello HELLO_wORLD :)

Isn't UPnP useful though? I think many applications rely on it to work, or am I wrong? It doesn't take too much CPU though, right?
 
LeKeiser said:
Hello HELLO_wORLD :)

Isn't UPnP useful though? I think many applications rely on it to work, or am I wrong? It doesn't take too much CPU though, right?
Click to expand...
UPnP on the router is only useful to set up the router using this protocol, or if the router itself is used as a media server.
Any UPnP devices on the LAN should be able to communicate with this protocol between each other, even if not enabled on the router.
 
HELLO_wORLD said:
Yep, I see this post ;)
Rules look fine to me, and if it works, then you know it is fine :)
You probably could simplify them by detecting the port (53 for DNS).
Something like
Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p tcp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p udp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
This would redirect all DNS traffic from LAN to your PiHole, whatever the dns server.
Click to expand...
Im trying to add these rules.
ive been trying to create /overlay/opt/scripts/firewall-start.sh file using vi command.
But its not saving.
Please help. Will this work without a pen drive ?
 
Last edited:
crowdme2 said:
Im trying to add these rules.
ive been trying to create /overlay/opt/scripts/firewall-start.sh file using vi command.
But its not saving.
Please help. Will this work without a pen drive ?
Click to expand...

I guess it depends which router you have. With R7800 or R9000 you don't need a pen-drive. With Orbi I think you do, if you want the changes to survive a reboot.

do the folders already exist?
if not then first do a mkdir -p /overlay/opt/scripts

(or just do vi /opt/scripts/firewall-start.sh and then when saving, the overlay-fs will handle the storing in the /overlay)
 
crowdme2 said:
I have an orbi (RBR50).
Thank you
So i do :x overlay-fs ?
Click to expand...
The Orbi has a slightly different file system, as its fs is loaded in memory at startup from overlay.
So any reboot resets the file system to original. The USB drive allows to overcome that problem.

I have a R7800, so I cannot help with the exact procedure, but other users here have the Orbi and can help you with that.
 
overlay-fs = overlay filesystem.

i.e. the files in /overlay are "layed over" the readonly filesystem that is in the firmware.
and if you modify a file that is in the readonly fs, then it automatically stores the modified version in the overlay.

in orbi that /overlay is in memory, thus lost at reboot. but with voxel fw that /overlay can also be stored on usb.
 
HELLO_wORLD said:
Yep, I see this post ;)
Rules look fine to me, and if it works, then you know it is fine :)
You probably could simplify them by detecting the port (53 for DNS).
Something like
Code: 
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p tcp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -p udp --dport 53 -s ! 192.168.1.2 -d ! 192.168.1.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2
This would redirect all DNS traffic from LAN to your PiHole, whatever the dns server.
Click to expand...
Hi HELLO_wORLD

I have an R7800 with another R7800 AP (upstairs by ethernet), and have just set up PiHole on a Raspberry Pi 4 as my DNS server (router is 'doing' DHCP). Latest 86 Voxel on both, of course :) That has all gone smoothly - so well that I am wondering if I can implement these simple port 53 rules WITHOUT Kamoj being installed, using Port Forwarding or something.

If I DO have to have Kamoj to do something like this, can I just install it on the main router in order to implement these rules, and not the AP as well? I am trying to keep firmware upgrades as simple as possible :) hence my reluctance to double up on Kamoj...
 
ianvajra said:
Hi HELLO_wORLD

I have an R7800 with another R7800 AP (upstairs by ethernet), and have just set up PiHole on a Raspberry Pi 4 as my DNS server (router is 'doing' DHCP). Latest 86 Voxel on both, of course :) That has all gone smoothly - so well that I am wondering if I can implement these simple port 53 rules WITHOUT Kamoj being installed, using Port Forwarding or something.

If I DO have to have Kamoj to do something like this, can I just install it on the main router in order to implement these rules, and not the AP as well? I am trying to keep firmware upgrades as simple as possible :) hence my reluctance to double up on Kamoj...
Click to expand...
Hi @ianvajra

No need to have the @kamoj addon on either router to use these rules, only @Voxel is necessary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Kamoj Kamoj Addon 5.5 Beta for Netgear R7800/R8900/R9000 with Voxel FW - Continuation
Replies
3
Views
294
kamoj
kamoj
B
AX88U Pro Optimal Antenna Positioning?
Replies
12
Views
884
drm200
D
G
Is it possible to copy flash of Netgear R9000 Router
Replies
2
Views
318
guy79
G
I
Best approach to mix aimesh nodes?
Replies
7
Views
1K
dfunked
D
D
r7800 v/ old Voxel firmware spontaneous factory reset. How to best proceed with REMOTE firmware update and reconfig?
Replies
3
Views
2K
NetBytes
N
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
0 Optimal trustless privacy configuration (DNScrypt/Unbound/Wireguard?) NETGEAR AC Routers and Adapters (Wi-Fi 5) 0

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!

Staff online

Members online

Total: 762 (members: 24, guests: 738)
Top