I wonder if this QOS can handle data parcels in such a way that it can send gaming packages to WAN Interface and the rest to VPN?
It might not be able to do it out of the box, but can such a feature be implemented?
ping @ttgapers
Well this chatGPT thingy that they implemented in bing searches said this.I’m not aware of that being possible. Brainstorming a way to do something similar I’d probably segment my network something like this. Maybe a better way would be to use VLAN's but I'm not sure how. But at least by doing this you could run Cake on router #2 and bandwidth limit on Router #1View attachment 48184
You need a VPN with Split Tunnelling, I wouldn't expect QoS management to be mangled into doing that for you.I wonder if this QOS can handle data parcels in such a way that it can send gaming packages to WAN Interface and the rest to VPN?
It might not be able to do it out of the box, but can such a feature be implemented?
ping @ttgapers
Which add-on are you referring to? Thanks!The Merlin firmware includes CAKE QOS. There is an addon that allows for more configuration and IMHO will make it work better yet it may meet your needs with out the addon.
If you have anything greater than 250mbps connection, I'd advise against using this.Is the stable version addon still CAKEQoS-Merlin v2.1.2 or did Dev 2.2.1 became final? Thanks!
Stumbled across this when noticing video streams lagging when load is applied elsewhere in the network ("bufferbloat") although if I understand what I'm reading right it will not work with my setup which is all traffic routed through a WireGuard VPN Client within the firmware. Is there a script or fix somewhere I need to download or some setting I need to adjust?
No offence, but that doesn't address the question. I use a WireGuard client to connect to my VPN provider, changing provider/program is not within my scope ... I'm asking if Cake QoS needs altered in some way to play nicely with a WG adapter. I read on the forum that it isn't supported out of the box because it classes all traffic as Upload.Even with WireGuard which is not particularly CPU intensive, a VPN introduces multiple places for congestion and this makes them less than ideal for real time applications such as video. You might have better luck with Tailscale as the VPN provider's network is not part of the flow.
No offence, but that doesn't address the question. I use a WireGuard client to connect to my VPN provider, changing provider/program is not within my scope ... I'm asking if Cake QoS needs altered in some way to play nicely with a WG adapter. I read on the forum that it isn't supported out of the box because it classes all traffic as Upload.
Does this translate to "Cake or any QoS setting does not work when VPN is enabled in router firmware" ?CAKE QOS is designed to address backpressure on the WAN interface. Even if your WAN link is loaded, that's just one of your issues and CAKE QOS is not the fix. A VPN is not designed for real time traffic, it's a security mechanism and bending it to route video traffic will frequently result in what you are experiencing. You need to address your design.
Does this translate to "Cake or any QoS setting does not work when VPN is enabled in router firmware" ?
I am probably mistaken or misunderstanding, but I was under the impression that Tailscale is simply a preconfigured version of WireGuard. perhaps even a branded one.Even with WireGuard which is not particularly CPU intensive, a VPN introduces multiple places for congestion and this makes them less than ideal for real time applications such as video. You might have better luck with Tailscale as the VPN provider's network is not part of the flow.
Tailscale is some "magic DNS" thing that allows computers connected to it's special subnet to communicate with eachother even from outside LAN.I am probably mistaken or misunderstanding, but I was under the impression that Tailscale is simply a preconfigured version of WireGuard. perhaps even a branded one.
All the QoS options and the Traffic Analyzer disable acceleration, the inspection is done by CPU so packets can't just run through the acceleration hardware as that is bypassing the CPU.To be honest, installing this seems to cut out the choppiness in video streams when under load, so it seems to be doing something. Some recommended settings posted earlier in the thread are doing *something* - although I notice the script turns off the acceleration on my particular model, I assume due to it being a slower router. Perhaps that was the fix after all.
Strange, I didn't notice Adaptive turning those options off.All the QoS options and the Traffic Analyzer disable acceleration, the inspection is done by CPU so packets can't just run through the acceleration hardware as that is bypassing the CPU.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!