Pak Kriss
Regular Contributor
Thanks for your feedback. For testing I switched to:
[1] --> Download Speed | [195 Mbit]
[2] --> Upload Speed | [195 Mbit]
[3] --> Queue Priority | [besteffort]
[4] --> Extra Download Options | [ethernet dual-dsthost]
[5] --> Extra Upload Options | [ethernet dual-srchost]
Sent from my SM-T805 using Tapatalk
[1] --> Download Speed | [195 Mbit]
[2] --> Upload Speed | [195 Mbit]
[3] --> Queue Priority | [besteffort]
[4] --> Extra Download Options | [ethernet dual-dsthost]
[5] --> Extra Upload Options | [ethernet dual-srchost]
Just providing a datapoint, my parent's connection is cable at a modest 30/5, and the settings that seem to work best for them are:
Download: 28.5 (95% of speed)
Upload: 4.75 (95% of speed)
Queue: besteffort
Extra Download Options: docsis dual-dsthost
Extra Upload Options: docsis dual-srchost
I ran it a while without the dual-xhost entries (meaning it was running on the default triple-isolate). It did generally a good job but bufferbloat tests were a little inconsistent.
As mentioned on https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user...pe_without_a_safety_net_aka_advanced_features:
If anyone else wants to test this out, there is no need to enter the "ingress" option as mentioned in this link as we already include it in our script for the "download" cake command.
Note: I don't use ack-filter as @Wade Coxon shared this article with me which suggests this option is good for 10+:1 dl/ul ratios: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ack_filtering/ (my parent's connection is 6:1). In other words, if your connection is something like 100/10 up/down, then you might be interested in testing out ack-filter.
EDIT: Sharing a screencap of the tests on DSLReports:
View attachment 24471
The tests up until mid-way to the 25.1 A+ result were on triple-isolate (you can see the results were inconsistent), everything after was with the above config.
Sent from my SM-T805 using Tapatalk