Thanks. Looks like the cause isn't an IP address conflict.192.168.1.100 - 210
Thanks. Looks like the cause isn't an IP address conflict.192.168.1.100 - 210
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 15:23:41 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:55:30 2008 Above message repeated 6 times
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:45:32 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 secured and linked
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:45:29 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 associated
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:45:29 2008 Above message repeated 1 times
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:45:07 2008 2.4GHz Band mssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000000000000 disconnected for reason: Authentication Failed
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:45:00 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 associated
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:44:59 2008 Above message repeated 3 times
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:44:35 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:44:02 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000000000000 disconnected for reason: Authentication Failed
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:44:01 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:43:56 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 associated
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:43:55 2008 Above message repeated 3 times
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:43:27 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:32:48 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 secured and linked
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:32:45 2008 2.4GHz Band myssid: Wireless system with MAC address 000CF1E77649 associated
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:32:26 2008 Above message repeated 5 times
[INFO] Sun Nov 09 14:32:24 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
...
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:50 2008 Above message repeated 1 times
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:43 2008 5GHz Band: Wireless link is up
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:42 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless link is up
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 5GHz Band: Wireless link is down
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 5GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 5GHz Band: Disconnect all stations
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless link is down
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 2.4GHz Band: Disconnect all stations
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:31 2008 All Wireless shut down
[INFO] Sat Nov 08 19:08:29 2008 2.4GHz Band: Wireless restart
I returned my 655 and purchased an 825. I have to believe the hardware in the 825 is better and any problems will be sorted-out shortly with new updates. I updated to 1.1 immediately, did basic set-up and the 825's worked perfectly for two days now. Without anything but seat-of-the-pants usage, the 825 range and speed seems to be better than the really good 655. I'm using this in conjunction with another 615 router I have covering another part of the house. So far I'm very happy with it. Granted, I'm not a network engineer or power user, but with three laptops and five desktops and a PS3 online in the house, I guess I qualify as a high utilization user, at least!
If they don't require the use of WDS bridging/repeating, yes, they should work.First off: Can i keep using the current range extenders i currently have?
Yes. The file sharing protocol doesn't care about the flavor of connection used (Ethernet, powerline, wireless). As long as there is a connection, file and printer sharing will work.2: Can i file share between the two different bands? Ie, whilst on my new imac (N band), i may want to access some files of the media mac mini, which would be on the G band.
Doubtful. Both antennas are dual-band, so you would need to use a dual-band antenna. Not easy to find.3: Can i replace the current antenna for the 5ghz band with a outdoor one so i can get coverage over to the holiday let?
If they don't require the use of WDS bridging/repeating, yes, they should work.
Yes. The file sharing protocol doesn't care about the flavor of connection used (Ethernet, powerline, wireless). As long as there is a connection, file and printer sharing will work.
Doubtful. Both antennas are dual-band, so you would need to use a dual-band antenna. Not easy to find.
You would probably be better off setting up another (11g) AP specifically to do the link.
WDS stands for Wireless Distribution System. From the description of what you are doing to connect everything up, i.e. entering MAC addresses, you are using WDS.
Gaming over a wireless connection can be a problem if the game requires fast response. Draft 11n especially has high throughput / latency variation and can have oeriodic 1-2 second throughput dropouts. 11g has lower throughput, but it tends to be more consistent. However, it too can suffer from the same periodic throughput dropouts.
In your situation, you certainly should use external high-gain antennas at both ends of the connection. Consider a combination AP/panel antenna like the Engenius EOC-3220. It's only 11g, but will probably provide a more reliable link than cobbling together something with draft 11n routers.
The 825's antennas are labeled 2.4 / 5 GHz, i.e. dual-band. Go look at this article for details on the DIR-825's innards.
I don't believe they use WDS. They are access points that can also be switched into acting as a client.Wow that looks good, didnt even know that they made those sorts of things. Do these work just like my belkin extenders?
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | I was surprised by the dlink 868L | General Wi-Fi Discussion | 0 |
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!