It means exactly what it says. It couldn't really be any clearer.What does this mean ?, trying 16E1
has anyone managed to get the asus app working on this firmware?
That's normal. Transmitter power won't directly change the RSSI or rx rate as they are a measure of the signal being received from the client. The tx rate is usually adjusted by the router to the lowest value that can maintain the required throughput. A more accurate test of power would be to measure the received (i.e. download) throughput (not link rate) at the client.I'm playing around with the tx "power" adjustments and I go from 200mw to 1mw and I don't see any difference, at least not in the wifi log RSSI or rx/tx rates. The same goes for the standard Merlin firmwares that I've tried. Is that not the correct way to judge wifi strength or has my router always been defective? If anything, I seem to get slightly better strength at 1mw than even the 80mw default.
It is my understanding that the setup values are actually maximums, and the router will adjust the signal strength downward if not needed to maintain the speed. Short of a well-designed test chamber, the best I have seen is to make throughput (not RSSI) measurements at a significant distance (one which does NOT permit maximum speed) with no intervening obstacles that might cause reflections, and record the average of ten or so speed tests from that same position.I'm playing around with the tx "power" adjustments and I go from 200mw to 1mw and I don't see any difference, at least not in the wifi log RSSI or rx/tx rates.
JFFS is a file system in flash memory meant to store small files (like scripts and configuration files). If you don't know what it is, you probably don't use it.
What does this mean ?, trying 16E1
What is JFFS ? Do i turn it OFF or what
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's normal. Transmitter power won't directly change the RSSI or rx rate as they are a measure of the signal being received from the client. The tx rate is usually adjusted by the router to the lowest value that can maintain the required throughput. A more accurate test of power would be to measure the received (i.e. download) throughput (not link rate) at the client.
He's OK. He said he'd be busy for couple weeks. Give him space.Hey, Folks - I've noticed that John hasn't been around here for a while - is he doing okay??
Perhaps the initiative to push folks towards GPL compliance might have something to do with it...
I can understand why folks have gone dark...
@hggomes - push your source, or pull it from distribution...
Start another thread please. This request has really nothing to do with this fork.
Actually, I think he's entitled to all the space he wants or needs - my concern is for his well-being, not his product...He's OK. He said he'd be busy for couple weeks. Give him space.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!