beneix
New Around Here
Hi, just joined to seek some advice.
The modem/router provided by my ISP is crippled, so I want to replace it – but I can't completely for ADSL and VoIP reasons. It also can't be put in bridge mode (did I mention it is crippled?) so I will have to use its DMZ functionality and put my main router behind it. This raises a couple of basic questions:
1. Can/should the ISP router and the main router be on the same subnet, e.g. ISP router = 192.168.1.1 and main router 192.168.1.2?
2. Let's say that instead the ISP router is 192.168.2.1 and the main router is 192.168.1.1. Does this mean the main router should have a WAN address on the 192.168.2.x subnet while handing out IP leases to LAN clients on the 192.168.1.x subnet?
3. Should the main router WAN interface be set to a static IP towards the ISP router, or get its IP via DHCP from the ISP router but have a static lease defined (on the ISP router)?
4. Can you even have cascading DHCP, i.e. both the ISP router and the main router act as DHCP servers? I assume it definitely isn't good if the answer to question 1 is yes – i.e. they are both on the same subnet, but perhaps fine if they are on different subnets?
5. If the ISP router is 192.168.2.1 and the main router is 192.168.1.1, I assume that "Gateway" for the WAN on the main router should be 192.168.2.1? Should "Gateway" on the LAN on the main router also be 192.168.2.1, or is it 192.168.1.1?
My current LAN is 192.168.1.1/24, and since I have quite a few things defined in scripts and configurations accordingly, I would like to keep several clients' IP addresses – hence some of the above questions.
The modem/router provided by my ISP is crippled, so I want to replace it – but I can't completely for ADSL and VoIP reasons. It also can't be put in bridge mode (did I mention it is crippled?) so I will have to use its DMZ functionality and put my main router behind it. This raises a couple of basic questions:
1. Can/should the ISP router and the main router be on the same subnet, e.g. ISP router = 192.168.1.1 and main router 192.168.1.2?
2. Let's say that instead the ISP router is 192.168.2.1 and the main router is 192.168.1.1. Does this mean the main router should have a WAN address on the 192.168.2.x subnet while handing out IP leases to LAN clients on the 192.168.1.x subnet?
3. Should the main router WAN interface be set to a static IP towards the ISP router, or get its IP via DHCP from the ISP router but have a static lease defined (on the ISP router)?
4. Can you even have cascading DHCP, i.e. both the ISP router and the main router act as DHCP servers? I assume it definitely isn't good if the answer to question 1 is yes – i.e. they are both on the same subnet, but perhaps fine if they are on different subnets?
5. If the ISP router is 192.168.2.1 and the main router is 192.168.1.1, I assume that "Gateway" for the WAN on the main router should be 192.168.2.1? Should "Gateway" on the LAN on the main router also be 192.168.2.1, or is it 192.168.1.1?
My current LAN is 192.168.1.1/24, and since I have quite a few things defined in scripts and configurations accordingly, I would like to keep several clients' IP addresses – hence some of the above questions.