Someone else was able to help here - thank you @ColinTaylorIf your router is not working, write to telegram @CrashXRu, I will restore the devices if possible
The impression I gather from watching this situation unfold is it's a combination of user error ( people using features that can potentially attract attacks) and also fixes needing to be applied to the software. I saw more people suffer loss from these attacks who used the sharing functions over those who didn't. With that said I think a few people still got hit who didn't use AICloud, but most who did get hit, had it enabled, as well as WAN access If I remember correctly.Yep SNB is a GREAT community.
But Asus has really harmed my trust in their product after a router malware attack.
it's a combination of user error
I said what I did because, even though the features exist, it's always been a recommendation not to use the router for sharing, but a device behind the router. So maybe it's not user error, but it's not best security practices either. I could apply the same argument to myself while I had UPNP enabled for the software I was using. However, after re-evaluating my use case and deciding I didn't need to keep the software around, I disabled UPNP. Same with AICloud functions built into the router. It's there for convenience, but the better solution would be to use a device to share data behind the router. It also depends on the use case too as far as why and how sharing was being used. You and quite a few others have also made the same observations / recommendations I mentioned here about using a device behind the router for sharing vs the router itself.How come using available firmware feature is a user error??
it's always been a recommendation not to use the router for sharing
I think not using the router for sharing recommendations are more in general terms and not specific to any brand hence maybe not user-error but more of not knowing in using the router for sharing.There is no such recommendation in the User Manual nor advice to check public forums before using the device.
They will now hahaConsumer users are not expected to have any prior networking or security knowledge.
I decided to go with TP-Link because reading reviews and forum posts people were giving me the impression Asus routers were not reliable especially lately.
It's been quite a while since I had to find something to replace the Apple Airport I was used to. Anyway, I don't mind saying I've made plenty of mistakes along the line.Your general talk about "sharing" practices is actually unrelated to AiCloud - its main purpose is not in sharing. Your new toy router may get hacked tomorrow and you may not even notice. Your previous Asus router at some point had a firewall open for about a month and you didn't know about it. So gather impressions and make sure, but don't judge others just because you've got lucky and bad things didn't happen to you... yet.
Remember this impression?
Based on your own assessment you did 3 user errors in short period of time - Asus RT-AX82U, Asus RT-AX86U, Asus RT-BE92U... why?
Does anyone have any official statement on this?
Does anyone have any official statement on this?
Asus office is saying there has not been a malware attack on routers,, and im the only one.
If anyone has any documentation, messages or anything it would help!
Thanks man, this is perfect!Yes, Asus:
![]()
News - ASUS Product Security Advisory - ASUS Router AiCloud vulnerability (01/02/2025)
Asus posted a Product Security Advisory on Jan 2, 2025 for Asus router AiCloud vulnerability. https://www.asus.com/content/asus-product-security-advisory/ 01/02/2025 ASUS Router AiCloud vulnerability Injection and execution vulnerabilities in certain ASUS router firmware series that allow...www.snbforums.com
Do a factory reset and manually configure. Do not use a saved settings file! And accept the EULA and other firmware upgrade agreements. Not doing so may, no will, cause problems. Accepting them will not hurt you one bit.Asus support has provided me a beta frimware that seems to correct some of the issues, but the router itself (its wifi) is running at 2-40mbps now, rediculously slow.
Has the malware caused permanent damage to my routers, or has the asus frimware not fully corrected it?
Asus offered a mail in diagnostic, but told me i may have to pay hundreds to repair it, should they be liable?
Additionally, the new frimware forces a EULA to be accepted to use the router, so i assume they were exposed legally from this situation.
I used an adblocker to block the popup to not accept it.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!