True, in my opinion. IIRC, it’s feasible to edit dnsmasq.postconf and remove the exit 0 and then restart dnsmasq, but it would return after a nextdns restart/reboot.So now it really makes no sense to have Diversion running alongside NextDNS?
I decided to removed nextdns. To be fair, Olivier is receptive to suggestions for how to improve it, but now it’s a commercial decision (IMO) how to ensure reliable service for paying subscribers. I think it’s a good deal $ overall, but not for me personally since I tinker way too much for my own good.