i meant micro not mini
How would I go about reducing the buffers on this router to reduce bufferbloat? The default txqueuelen is 1000 isn't it? I want to reduce that. On ISCI netalyzer I had 1200ms uplink until I changed some things and now it's at 260-360 and want to get it even lower.
Just curious why do you think theres a bufferbloat problem with the router? Also how did you reduce from 1200ms to 260ms?
thanks
I was reading that buffer bloat fixes are going into Linux 3.7 version, so just wait, it'll catch up with us eventually *smile*.
For anyone interested the new 3.4.3.6-069 build finally has SSL support for the webui
How did you make this work, I tried enabling https under administration but it went back to http
What is the advantage to doing it like that? From the outside the router is protected from WAN via firewall, etc, from the inside if you connect over wifi w/ WPA your connection is encrypted, and if you connect over LAN I thing that is a pretty low risk snooping/attack vector.
If anything, I'm reluctant to put a cert on my router that isn't publicly verifiable and I must force my browser to make an exception for.
Thank you for any feedback as to what I'm missing or inaccurate on, I'd like to understand how this capability works and what advantages it is supposed to have.
Since QoS is disabled in Padavan's firmware, how do I make sure that my gaming traffic is prioritized over other network traffic like p2p?
Anyone? I want to make sure I can have lag free online gaming even when my room mate is torrenting.
What is the advantage to doing it like that? From the outside the router is protected from WAN via firewall, etc, from the inside if you connect over wifi w/ WPA your connection is encrypted, and if you connect over LAN I thing that is a pretty low risk snooping/attack vector.
If anything, I'm reluctant to put a cert on my router that isn't publicly verifiable and I must force my browser to make an exception for.
Thank you for any feedback as to what I'm missing or inaccurate on, I'd like to understand how this capability works and what advantages it is supposed to have.
Probably the two best things you could do would be to hardwire your console/PC that you're gaming from and give it direct access to a switched router port, and also go into his torrent client and manually tweak it's UL/DL bandwidth allotments and also max # simultaneous downloads & upload seeds. You can probably even set a preset or two (depending on torrent client) for aggressive bandwidth utilization and a "lite" use profile for when you're gaming.
Yeah I read that there are a lot of fixes coming up but the current method for reducing it for linux routers is to reduce the buffer size. This router has a 1000 packet buffer and I just want to know how to reduce that. There are script options but I don't know what commands will fix it.
Last year when I ran Netalyzer on my old gaming machine, my uplink had 1200ms and a few days ago I tested it again on my current machine and it was once again 1200ms. It dropped down to 300 average when I ran TCP Optimizer, reduced NIC transmit buffers from 512 to 16 and changed Duplex from 1000 to 100 full duplex. I did all this before running the test again.
I read that there are a lot of fixes coming up but the current method for reducing it for linux routers is to reduce the buffer size. This router has a 1000 packet buffer and I just want to know how to reduce that. There are script options but I don't know what commands will fix it.
ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 10
ifconfig eth0
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!