well it actually is within / / if you look at the regexp
and it still doesnt explain why it works for the rest of us when we are running the same software
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 119 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
awk '$local_v4' .............
ASUSWRT-Merlin RT-AC87U 380.65-4 Wed Mar 29 04:40:59 UTC 2017
...@RT-AC87U:/tmp/home/root# /jffs/scripts/privacy-filter
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 81 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
system: Privacy Filter (ipv6) loaded 0 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
OK
Thank you very much! The syntax error is history ... but why are no IPv6 addresses loaded?
Code:ASUSWRT-Merlin RT-AC87U 380.65-4 Wed Mar 29 04:40:59 UTC 2017 ...@RT-AC87U:/tmp/home/root# /jffs/scripts/privacy-filter system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 81 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router. system: Privacy Filter (ipv6) loaded 0 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
yes and yesis IPv6 enabled in your router ? and is the firewall for ipv6 enabled ?
ASUSWRT-Merlin RT-AC87U 380.65-4 Wed Mar 29 04:40:59 UTC 2017
...@RT-AC87U:/tmp/home/root# /jffs/scripts/privacy-filter
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
[no records in the reply]
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 152 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
system: Privacy Filter (ipv6) loaded 12 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
Yes, for the given URLs, it definitely works I'm thinking a bit more broadly, i.e. tracking if Microsoft is implementing updates that are changing URLs and IP addresses on a regular basis which would require making changes to the filter list constantly. It's not something specific to the privacy-filter script.@jayten there is a command for showing how much is blocked in the thread
but here it is again
iptables -L -v | grep "privacy-filter_ipv"
the numbers in the row indicate how much was blocked
Code:pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 158 8232 REJECT all -- any any anywhere anywhere match-set privacy-filter_ipv4 dst reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
Dont remember if windows 7 updates was able to remove telemetry rarely run older OS anywhere
ASUSWRT-Merlin RT-AC87U 380.65-4 Wed Mar 29 04:40:59 UTC 2017
...@RT-AC87U:/tmp/home/root# /jffs/scripts/privacy-filter
nslookup: can't resolve 'oyag.prugskh.net'
nslookup: can't resolve 'oyag.prugskh.com'
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 76 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
system: Privacy Filter (ipv6) loaded 6 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
wow no takers ? or is there nothing to report on this version if so ill bump it officially
nslookup: can't resolve 's.gateway.messenger.live.com'
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added
ipset v6.29: Element cannot be added to the set: it's already added...
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 0 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 57 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
nslookup: can't resolve 's.gateway.messenger.live.com'
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 49 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
i updated the test build again added sort -u to the script to sort out duplicate the low numbers are due to ab-solutions large blocklists mine is getting around 117-120 blocks
nslookup: can't resolve 's.gateway.messenger.live.com'
system: Privacy Filter (ipv4) loaded 49 unique ip addresses that will be rejected from contacting your router.
admin@RT-AC88U:/tmp/home/root# nslookup s.gateway.messenger.live.com
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address 1: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!