Sinner
Senior Member
I realize that but have been lead to believe its not compatible with 382+It have been replaced by v382
I realize that but have been lead to believe its not compatible with 382+It have been replaced by v382
I realize that but have been lead to believe its not compatible with 382+
Mar 8 12:58:06 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 12:58:09 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 12:58:09 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 12:58:10 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 12:58:26 adaptive QOS: Applying Custom Upload Rules
Mar 8 12:58:28 adaptive QOS: Applying Custom Download Rules
Mar 8 12:59:31 adaptive QOS: Parsing User QOS Rates -> (Updating)
Mar 8 12:59:31 rc_service: udhcpc 8844:notify_rc start_firewall
Mar 8 12:59:32 miniupnpd[8911]: shutting down MiniUPnPd
Mar 8 12:59:32 dhcp_client: bound xxx.xx.xx.116 via xxx.xx.0.1 during 3600 seconds.
Mar 8 12:59:32 nat: apply nat rules (/tmp/nat_rules_eth0_eth0)
Mar 8 12:59:33 custom_script: Running /jffs/scripts/firewall-start (args: eth0)
Mar 8 12:59:33 miniupnpd[16461]: HTTP listening on port 33239
Mar 8 12:59:33 miniupnpd[16461]: Listening for NAT-PMP/PCP traffic on port 5351
Mar 8 12:59:51 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change.
Mar 8 12:59:52 adaptive QOS: Applying Iptables Rules
Mar 8 12:59:52 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:10 class rate
Mar 8 12:59:53 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:11 class rate
Mar 8 12:59:55 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:12 class rate
Mar 8 12:59:55 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10012 is small. Consider r2q change.
Mar 8 12:59:57 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:13 class rate
Mar 8 12:59:58 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10014 is small. Consider r2q change.
Mar 8 13:00:00 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:14 class rate
Mar 8 13:00:02 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10015 is small. Consider r2q change.
Mar 8 13:00:03 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:15 class rate
Mar 8 13:00:05 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:16 class rate
Mar 8 13:00:06 kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10017 is small. Consider r2q change.
Mar 8 13:00:08 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:17 class rate
Mar 8 13:00:44 disk_monitor: Got SIGALRM...
That has to be enabled under administration in the web interface. You will know which one it is once you see it.
Use manual bandwidth with 90-95% of your achievable.
Hi FreshJR,Ok, everyone, here is BETA8.
Mar 8 06:59:56 rc_service: httpd 283:notify_rc restart_qos;restart_firewall
Mar 8 06:59:56 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 07:00:15 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 07:00:15 adaptive QOS: Warming Up
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: Applying Custom Upload Rules
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: iptables v1.4.15: unknown option "--set-mark"
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: iptables v1.4.15: unknown option "--set-mark"
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
Mar 8 07:00:29 adaptive QOS: Applying Custom Download Rules
Mar 8 07:01:37 adaptive QOS: Parsing User QOS Rates -> (No Changes)
Mar 8 07:01:37 nat: apply nat rules (/tmp/nat_rules_ppp0_eth0)
Mar 8 07:01:38 custom_script: Running /jffs/scripts/firewall-start (args: ppp0)
Mar 8 07:01:57 adaptive QOS: Applying Iptables Rules
Mar 8 07:01:57 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:10 class rate
Mar 8 07:01:58 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:11 class rate
Mar 8 07:01:59 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:12 class rate
Mar 8 07:02:01 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:13 class rate
Mar 8 07:02:04 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:14 class rate
Mar 8 07:02:06 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:15 class rate
Mar 8 07:02:08 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:16 class rate
Mar 8 07:02:09 adaptive QOS: Adaptive QOS: Changing 1:17 class rate
Thank you, you were right. The splitted section is new to beta8 so I didn't recognize it and pasted the rules right below realtc filters as it was before. Sorry for my blindness!You probably either your have all your iptable rules in the wrong section
Thank you, @FreshJR. May I ask again that the first percentage is for upload and the second one is for download bandwidth?
no its general range recommended for both.
Its supposed to be lower than 100% of your max bandwidth on both.
How much lower depends on your isp. So 85-95% is just a general range.
Thanks @Vexira! I will try both values to see which are the most suitable ones for my Internet speed95% if using speedtest.net values 85% for ISP values.
@FreshJR , I noticed that although I set up iptables and it gets matches traffic from the classified ip address gets classified as other instead of netcontrol
Yes, that would be fine (not only for me), thank you in advance!If you need a working rule for "defaults" that wont get redirected into "others" just ask.
I can post an example.
Yes, that would be fine (not only for me), thank you in advance!
already included in the upcoming release candidate. Just give it a another day (maybe a few hours) if I dont fall asleep.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!