Hi,
I'm one of those people who like to tinker everything to see how it works, especially with new technologies and features.
In my time playing with the ASUSWRT I encountered the promising SMART-CONNECT feature, a really nice feature that uses only one access point for all the bands, and moves the clients across them depending on the configuration defined in the Smart Connect Rules.
But I have to say that this feature seems incompatible with network stability for one simple reason:
It forces the user to be stuck with Auto channels, which means that the channels will change randomly, and when a channel changes: all the clients in that band lose the connection.
I have to say that I'm surprised that this problem has been there for so long when I believe it shouldn't be hard to implement.
This issue has been mentioned many times in this forum, here are some examples:
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/smart-connect-need-to-force-control-channel.37892/
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/b...eta-is-now-available.44941/page-5#post-385444
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/b...eta-is-now-available.44941/page-5#post-385518
I'd like to request to allow the manual selection of Control Channels when using the SMART-CONNECT feature.
I'm creating a poll to see who else is interested in this.
Thank you very much.
I'm one of those people who like to tinker everything to see how it works, especially with new technologies and features.
In my time playing with the ASUSWRT I encountered the promising SMART-CONNECT feature, a really nice feature that uses only one access point for all the bands, and moves the clients across them depending on the configuration defined in the Smart Connect Rules.
But I have to say that this feature seems incompatible with network stability for one simple reason:
The Control Channels cannot be specified manually.
It forces the user to be stuck with Auto channels, which means that the channels will change randomly, and when a channel changes: all the clients in that band lose the connection.
I have to say that I'm surprised that this problem has been there for so long when I believe it shouldn't be hard to implement.
This issue has been mentioned many times in this forum, here are some examples:
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/smart-connect-need-to-force-control-channel.37892/
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/b...eta-is-now-available.44941/page-5#post-385444
https://www.snbforums.com/threads/b...eta-is-now-available.44941/page-5#post-385518
I'd like to request to allow the manual selection of Control Channels when using the SMART-CONNECT feature.
I'm creating a poll to see who else is interested in this.
Thank you very much.