E
eigna
Guest
I just received the Netopia 2210-02 from AT&T here in Miami. While researching as to why my connection felt sluggish at times even while limitting my P2P download to half my down speed and up speed. I ran the connection analyzer at:
http://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php
and saw that my MTU said 1448. Yet I have it set to 1492 on my NIC. I dug deeper and found:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20740269-Modem-Netopia-2210-MTU-cap
So it seems that it IS capped thru the modem/router itself. Also in moderate p2p (Bitorrent or eMule) even limitting the speed to half seems to still give me bad results in online games (high latency of 1000+).
Now I haven't changed my MTU yet on my NIC, but I am just thinking of putting it in bridged mode and using a router that I'll go out and buy. But I would like to know if doing something else would maybe yield better result.
1. Would changing the MTU on the NIC to 1448 provide better latency due to no fragmenting of packets?
2. If not or if I should go with a router what router should I get? I'm looking for something around the $50 or so range. I've used a DLink EBR-2310 Rev. A, before and it crashes/reboots under moderate to heavy P2P use. I've also used a DIR-655 and that seems to do well, but it's in the $100+ range. I don't care whether it's a wired or wireless router, but it has to have at least 1 wired port, since I actually don't have a wireless NIC. I would like a cheap router that can handle many concurrent connections.
I have looked at the cheap router roundup, but that article is quite dated, and the Airlink seems extinct. Any chance it could get updated every 1-2 years, since tech changes quickly?
I'm not averse to spending a bit more in order to get the number of connections, but I would like to save a few bucks where if possible.
Thanks for any help you may provide.
http://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php
and saw that my MTU said 1448. Yet I have it set to 1492 on my NIC. I dug deeper and found:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20740269-Modem-Netopia-2210-MTU-cap
So it seems that it IS capped thru the modem/router itself. Also in moderate p2p (Bitorrent or eMule) even limitting the speed to half seems to still give me bad results in online games (high latency of 1000+).
Now I haven't changed my MTU yet on my NIC, but I am just thinking of putting it in bridged mode and using a router that I'll go out and buy. But I would like to know if doing something else would maybe yield better result.
1. Would changing the MTU on the NIC to 1448 provide better latency due to no fragmenting of packets?
2. If not or if I should go with a router what router should I get? I'm looking for something around the $50 or so range. I've used a DLink EBR-2310 Rev. A, before and it crashes/reboots under moderate to heavy P2P use. I've also used a DIR-655 and that seems to do well, but it's in the $100+ range. I don't care whether it's a wired or wireless router, but it has to have at least 1 wired port, since I actually don't have a wireless NIC. I would like a cheap router that can handle many concurrent connections.
I have looked at the cheap router roundup, but that article is quite dated, and the Airlink seems extinct. Any chance it could get updated every 1-2 years, since tech changes quickly?
I'm not averse to spending a bit more in order to get the number of connections, but I would like to save a few bucks where if possible.
Thanks for any help you may provide.