Mutzli
Very Senior Member
No problem loading it. Did you use Stubby integration?How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
No problem loading it. Did you use Stubby integration?How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
Instead of relying on a Google DNS, Cloudflare, Quad9 or NextDNS, Unbound will let you perform the same DNS functions as those public resolvers. Unbound will deal directly with the authoritative name server (i.e. domain owner) instead of relying on a third-party to do that. You cut out that middle-man. If you only want to use Unbound as another forwarder, it won't really offer much benefit over the built-in dnsmasq.
When Unbound gets a DNS request from a client, it will not use a single upstream server like you may be used to. Say it gets a request to lookup www.snbforums.com. First it will query the root DNS servers to see what server is the owner of the .com top-level domain. Once it knows that server identity, it will query that one to see which DNS nameserver owns snbforums.com within the .com domain. Once it gets that response, it will query the snbforums.com DNS server to get the IP for www within snbforums.com.
It does all that directly between you and those servers, without sharing your DNS query data with a third-party DNS resolver like the ones I mentioned earlier.
I agree that this explanation should be added to the first post of this thread. It would also be nice if there were an explanation of how to configure this relative to the built-in Merlin firmware DNSSEC and DoT setting. I guess "Unbound_manager" is meant to provide that.
How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
This will depend on how you set up unbound and other services. Unbound use some time ago and I can access https://www.asrock.com/How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
rgnldo@rgnldo-lan:/tmp/home/root# sh /jffs/scripts/gen_unbound.sh
Removing unbound.conf files..
Removing log's files...
Memory management...
Configuring REDIS support...
Restarting services...
Starting ntpdate... done.
Shutting down unbound... done.
Starting unbound... done.
Shutting down haveged... done.
Shutting down suricata... done.
Starting suricata... done.
Shutting down clamav... done.
Starting clamav... done.
Checking haveged... alive.
Checking unbound... alive.
Checking ntpdate... alive.
Checking suricata... alive.
Checking clamav... alive.
unbound-checkconf: no errors in /opt/var/lib/unbound/unbound.conf
I think you may have missed the point of @dave14305 s post. If you run Unbound, there is no point in configuring DoT, DNSSEC or NextDNS since in two out of those three, you're your own DNS resolver.....and as far as DNSSEC goes, Unbound is configured to handle that on it's own......
Suricata, ClamAV
Maybe this is the 'lite' version?
How come when I install Unbound, the address https://www.asrock.com/ doesn't work?
Both pre-install and after-uninstall makes the site work again.
Disregard for the purposes of this post. It is not the focus. Some time ago I organized Suricata and Clamav. Suricata for routers via Entware. It all depends on the configuration and the rules.Must be a very light version. Depending on what it is checking for, that thing can kill a server hardware. ClamAV is actually heavier than normally setup Suricata, in my experience. And there is no much control over it.
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Notice> - This is Suricata version 4.1.4 RELEASE
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_WARN_FLOWBIT(306)] - flowbit 'et.IE7.NoRef.NoCookie' is checked but not set. Checked in 2024192 and 1 o>
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_WARN_FLOWBIT(306)] - flowbit 'ET.http.binary' is checked but not set. Checked in 2025195 and 1 other si>
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_WARN_FLOWBIT(306)] - flowbit 'ET.http.javaclient' is checked but not set. Checked in 2017557 and 1 othe>
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_WARN_FLOWBIT(306)] - flowbit 'et.JavaArchiveOrClass' is checked but not set. Checked in 2017772 and 1 o>
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:57 - <Warning> - [ERRCODE: SC_WARN_FLOWBIT(306)] - flowbit 'ET.pdf.in.http' is checked but not set. Checked in 2017790 and 0 other si>
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:58 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:58 - <Notice> - AFL mode starting
10/2/2020 -- 15:05:58 - <Notice> - all 2 packet processing threads, 0 management threads initialized, engine started.
They appeared there because I launched the restart of all services. Disregard for the purposes of this post...*Suricata, ClamAV and I think ntpdate too.
This got me thinking about QName minimization. I’m not certain qname minimization is active in forward mode, but even if it is, it can’t provide much benefit because you still end up forwarding the entire qname to the forward server eventually, so you’ve still lost your privacy benefit by relying on a forwarder.Even if you don't use the recursive root server's function, you will still have DNSSEC, QNAME MINIMIZATION and
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!