Asuswrt-Merlin 3.0.0.4.374.34 is out

[oric1]

Rejecting attempt at SPNEGO session setup

Merlin,

I kept getting these on my N66U. Is there any cause for concern? Thanks.

Nov 26 22:02:44 dnsmasq-dhcp[535]: DHCPACK(br0) 192.168.1.143 00:27:19:f5:d2:ed oric1-PC
Nov 26 22:04:44 smbd[784]: [2013/11/26 22:04:44, 0] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1265)
Nov 26 22:04:44 smbd[784]:   reply_sesssetup_and_X:  Rejecting attempt at SPNEGO session setup when it was not negoitiated.
Nov 26 22:04:47 smbd[785]: [2013/11/26 22:04:47, 0] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1265)
Nov 26 22:04:47 smbd[785]:   reply_sesssetup_and_X:  Rejecting attempt at SPNEGO session setup when it was not negoitiated.
Nov 26 22:04:51 dnsmasq-dhcp[535]: DHCPINFORM(br0) 192.168.1.141 1c:6f:65:36:08:b9

 

[RMerlin]

Merlin,

I kept getting these on my N66U. Is there any cause for concern? Thanks.

Nov 26 22:02:44 dnsmasq-dhcp[535]: DHCPACK(br0) 192.168.1.143 00:27:19:f5:d2:ed oric1-PC
Nov 26 22:04:44 smbd[784]: [2013/11/26 22:04:44, 0] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1265)
Nov 26 22:04:44 smbd[784]:   reply_sesssetup_and_X:  Rejecting attempt at SPNEGO session setup when it was not negoitiated.
Nov 26 22:04:47 smbd[785]: [2013/11/26 22:04:47, 0] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1265)
Nov 26 22:04:47 smbd[785]:   reply_sesssetup_and_X:  Rejecting attempt at SPNEGO session setup when it was not negoitiated.
Nov 26 22:04:51 dnsmasq-dhcp[535]: DHCPINFORM(br0) 192.168.1.141 1c:6f:65:36:08:b9

No idea what that means, this is an authentication issue with Samba. Try a Google search for that message, I've never seen it.

 

[SilverFox2]

Hopefully..its just the pic that is wrong...otherwise..you're getting a power cord.

Also..that is an OLD card. That only support 5ghz at 54g speeds.

Anyway....yea...that is the longer card...old laptops use those....most newer models use half height cards....u would need to open up your laptop rear panel and see what size it uses(if it is even accessible)

I would say get a newer one...but again...they are the smaller size cards,....http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00864Q45W/?tag=smallncom-21

The card you suggested has been ordered, delivered and fitted, despite my lack of skills I found it surprisingly easy to install.
Firmware for my W7 64 bit OS PC found on Intel Support Site and downloaded easily.
Computer installed Driver without incident and as you expected it now allows the 5 GHz Band to be seen (via inSSIDer) and therefore used on my Computer.

Many thanks for your patient constructive criticism and suggestions.

 

[mobileman88]

The card you suggested has been ordered, delivered and fitted, despite my lack of skills I found it surprisingly easy to install.
Firmware for my W7 64 bit OS PC found on Intel Support Site and downloaded easily.
Computer installed Driver without incident and as you expected it now allows the 5 GHz Band to be seen (via inSSIDer) and therefore used on my Computer.

Many thanks for your patient constructive criticism and suggestions.

Very good news

 

[wsarahan]

@Merlin

I use here loadbalance at RTAC66U and i just bought an RTAC68U

Is there any way with the load balance to send a full range to be resolved by the secondary link?

An example, i want the 64.125.x.x to go to my secondary link, is that possible? I just found the route rules inserting the full ips like 64.125.1.1 as example

Or now that i have both routers is there a way to connect each link in the routers and make they work together and send all the traffic from some range to one or another?

Remembering that i have 2 network cards at my PC


Thanks

 

[bigmag]

@ Merlin

why does not the Clone MAC Funktion

 

[RMerlin]

@ Merlin

why does not the Clone MAC Funktion

Works fine for me. When I click on Clone MAC, the MAC field gets filled with my client computer's MAC.