Those with still NTP issues, what happens if you manually launch the client this way?
Code:ntpclient -h $(nvram get ntp_server0) -i 3 -l -s
Those with still NTP issues, what happens if you manually launch the client this way?
# ntpclient -h $(nvram get ntp_server0) -i 3 -l -s
setup_receive:: bind...
setup_transmit:: connect...
hi! AC68 here
I just made a switch to verify something about CTF+FA , like a said in a earlier post normaly with ac68 only CTF is available.
Both Official Asus 378.9135 and 378.56 beta 1-2 , FA is always active even after reboot,factory default and cleared Nvram.
consequence= Cpu status page always reporting both cores sticking at 0% with massives data transfer and download,i have
tried disable and re-enable NAT , and FA is still there. Now i know its an Asus issue and maybe not fixable
It was just to report
Back to .55 and i only see CTF and CPU cores showing something when they are at work
Thanx for the great work
This worked for me. After reboot the upgrade went through successfully.That message often occurs if the router is too low on free RAM. Try rebooting with no USB disks plugged in as John recommended, then retry flashing.
I am still having issues with Adaptive QOS on .56 Beta 2 that I had in .55. When I set my upload and download maximum bandwidths to 150mpbs each, on speedtests, my download speeds are capped to 50mpbs while my upload speeds reaches my ISP theoretical speed of 150mbps. Disabling Adaptive QOS returns my download speed to 150mbps.
Edit: Forgot to include my router model, AC56U.
This worked for me
Didn’t know that factory resetting erases JFFS too. Had to restore JFFS in addition to the normal settings via nvram-save.
In the DHCP list if the port range is too long to be viewed and gets truncated, when editing it the truncated string gets copied in to the edit box.
i thinking about this and i have a question....
In network map what first field show (when we want edit device) ? description or hostname ? For me sometimes is description, sometimes hostname. What is the main function ?
IMO this field can't have dual function
What this....description or hostname
View attachment 4672
i defined this i dhcp/static so should be hostname
If description-why sometimes show hostname ? if hostname, what for some devices show something different than we defined in static ?
i thinking about this and i have a question....
In network map what first field show (when we want edit device) ? description or hostname ? For me sometimes is description, sometimes hostname. What is the main function ?
IMO this field can't have dual function
What this....description or hostname
View attachment 4672
i defined this i dhcp/static so should be hostname
If description-why sometimes show hostname ? if hostname, what for some devices show something different than we defined in static ?
Once again reporting the issue with name clients to RMerlin have been omitted. Ehhh Creating this firmware is going in the wrong direction. Towards lousy.
OK, now i understand.If no description exists, then the router will display either the current hostname (whether it came from the client itself or from a DHCP static lease), or a description built out of networkmap's queries sent to the device (which can result in a netbios name, or some other naming mechanism).
Once you change whatever is there through Networkmap, then it becomes the description for that device, and gets stored to nvram. It has no impact on the hostname, which is what you would use for network access (as it will resolve to the device's IP).
The reason why I kept the two separate after initially trying to unite them is because they cannot be interchanged. Asus allows descriptions that can be invalid as hostnames, so therefore I cannot just reuse a description as a hostname. Therefore, the two shall remain separate. Description is for the webui's use, hostnames is for network's use. I cannot enforce both fields as a hostname because it would require a factory default reset for anyone running either the stock firmware or an older version of my firmware. And I cannot enforce it as a description like Asus does because it would mean there is no way to specify a device's hostname.
This is by design, for very good reasons, and will not be changed.
Look back three posts to post #97Only this is not a solution to the problem but ok. I will not argue with you. You do not even have explained how these names are displayed and asked VANT wondered. I also.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!