JemTheWire
Senior Member
Thank you all very much. That’s what I wanted. In my haste I made a few silly typos.
Now I know how to invoke the meme, I’m ‘good to go’.
Now I know how to invoke the meme, I’m ‘good to go’.
Can this (suricata)run along side of Skynet? Sorry for the off topic question.
can't go wrong with Gromit! just keep Wallace away from cake.Thank you all very much. That’s what I wanted. In my haste I made a few silly typos.
Now I know how to invoke the meme, I’m ‘good to go’.
Please, also enter for unlimited
if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then
extraoptions="unlimited $extraoptions"
fi
Would it be better to set unlimited if 0 is input, and autorate-ingress if auto is entered?Please, also enter for unlimited
Code:if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then extraoptions="unlimited $extraoptions" fi
it's a possibility.Would it be better to set unlimited if 0 is input, and autorate-ingress if auto is entered?
i think that makes it less general-user friendly ("0" for unlimited vs explicit option).Would it be better to set unlimited if 0 is input, and autorate-ingress if auto is entered?
It would also allow different options for upload and download
Locally, the ‘NBN’ sits between most customers & their ISP’s.
The NBN does the ‘last mile’ of most connections. The ISP infrastructure can be A1, but the NBN has to be gone through first.
It’s just the local situation we have to work with.
I know autoingress worked well for you@maghuro autorate-ingress worked well for me, to tame my UL line that oscillates from 3Mbps to 20Mbps on a work day.
i did get latency spikes at the beginning of a UL transfer burst but it was controlled after a few moments. and it was better tradeoff than setting my UL limit to a very low 4Mbps.
this being said, i am now trying "unlimited" instead, but i won't know how it performs until Monday and people at home start dialing into work
So for an auto bandwidth management, we have to use unlimited instead of auto-ingress?Please, also enter for unlimited
Code:if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then extraoptions="unlimited $extraoptions" fi
Both.So for an auto bandwidth management, we have to use unlimited instead of auto-ingress?
if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then
extraoptions="autorate-ingress unlimited $extraoptions"
fi
As I can't send you PM, send me your WhatsAppBoth.
Code:if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then extraoptions="autorate-ingress unlimited $extraoptions" fi
which commit? how do i get it?I know autoingress worked well for you
I just want you to try if this commit implements autoingress well!
Testing. Not setting "auto" at the DL/ UP rateauto-ingress
I'm not sure it's that straight forward for all use cases.Both.
Code:if [ "${dlspeed}" = "auto" ] || [ "${upspeed}" = "auto" ]; then extraoptions="autorate-ingress unlimited $extraoptions" fi
CAKE uses a deficit-mode shaper, which does not exhibit the initial
burst typical of token-bucket shapers. It will automatically burst
precisely as much as required to maintain the configured throughput.
As such, it is very straightforward to configure.
unlimited (default)
No limit on the bandwidth.
bandwidth RATE
Set the shaper bandwidth. See tc(8) or examples below for
details of the RATE value.
autorate-ingress
Automatic capacity estimation based on traffic arriving at this
qdisc. This is most likely to be useful with cellular links, which
tend to change quality randomly. A bandwidth parameter can be used
in conjunction to specify an initial estimate. The shaper will
periodically be set to a bandwidth slightly below the estimated rate.
This estimator cannot estimate the bandwidth of links downstream of
itself.
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 CakeQOS-Merlin: Starting - ( 36Mbit | 9Mbit | besteffort | ether-vlan ack-filter )
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete,391: Could not rdpa_wlan_mcast_fwd_table_get[0m
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] runnerMcast_deactivate,724: WLAN: Could not pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete, ret = -8[0m
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete,391: Could not rdpa_wlan_mcast_fwd_table_get[0m
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] runnerMcast_deactivate,724: WLAN: Could not pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete, ret = -8[0m
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete,391: Could not rdpa_wlan_mcast_fwd_table_get[0m
Jun 27 14:17:08 RT-AX88U-9D28 kernel: [0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] runnerMcast_deactivate,724: WLAN: Could not pktrunner_wlan_mcast_delete, ret = -8[0m
J
Good old NBN.
I was reading up on the infrastructure for another purpose and the Government really messed that up. Instead of spending that 51 billion on running Fiber to every residence, they gave you a mix of HFC,FTTP,FTTN,FTTC,FTTB.
With FTTP = FTTH the rest are DSL connections and one Coaxial one.
https://www.nbnco.com.au/learn/network-technology/fibre-to-the-curb-explained-fttc
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!