Anyone? Should I have to use docsis or similar?
Post your speedtests/bufferbloat results. You may not need it (as you aren't on a Docsis - cable modem connection).
Anyone? Should I have to use docsis or similar?
Southern Canada - isn't that Florida?
I only know of Western Canada, Eastern Canada, the Maritimes, and "The Great North".
Installed CakeQOS on my AC86U with Merlin 384.18 beta1.
When I run tc -s qdisc show dev ifb9eth0, I get Cannot find device "ifb9eth0". The other two commands in the CLI section of the README work.
Thank you, just to confirm - will the update option check all components so simply running that will update everything in future or is it only cake binaries as implied by the ReadMe?Pleased to announce v0.0.3 has been released (I had time to hammer through most of the roadmap):
- update and uninstall options added
I definitely "enabled" it. I see the entry in /jffs/scripts/firewall-startSeems like you are missing/didn't run step 3 at a minimum from: https://github.com/ttgapers/cakeqos-merlin#cakeqos-merlin
That enables and starts cake based on your up/down and any other additional parameters you require.
Yes, it works if I start it manually. It just does not start upon reboot. I have scribe, connmon, ntpmerlin, scmerlin, and uiscribe all working fine upon reboot.Copy the firewall-start line item and run it in a SSH session and replace "enable" with "start". What do you get?
Here you go in-between footie
Hope that helps!
- I don't use Traffic Analyser, but if it has any dependency on Stock Traditional/Adaptive/FreshJr/Daves QoS then I don't expect it to work as this should be switched off
- I do not believe it can, as you must specify up/down or it just uses line speed. I referenced that in an earlier post. I would say give it whirl, the script is seemless now from a install, stop, disable, uninstall perspective.
- This is where the detailed reading about Cake in the first post, it's a shift in thinking on how it queues/prioritizes traffic. I've been running besteffort over a week on a pretty saturated connection - internal web server hosting media center, 2x VPN servers, Teams/Skype, Zoom, WebEx web conferencing etc. and I've seen a remarkable change in stability and quality overall. My stats back it, without having to "tweak" based on app, port, protocol etc....as mentioned I've never had consistent "meaning anytime I feel like running tests" buffer bloat straight A+s as I have seen with Cake.
Maybe run dos2unix against the script with the startup line in it. Example dos2unix /jffs/scripts/firewall-startYes, it works if I start it manually. It just does not start upon reboot. I have scribe, connmon, ntpmerlin, scmerlin, and uiscribe all working fine upon reboot.
> /jffs/scripts/cake-qos start 200Mbit 10Mbit "besteffort docsis ack-filter" # cake-qos
Broadcom Packet Flow Cache learning via BLOG disabled.
Broadcom Packet Flow Cache flushing the flows
>tc -s qdisc show dev ifb9eth0
qdisc cake 8002: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 200Mbit besteffort triple-isolate nat wash ingress ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms noatm overhead 18 mpu 64 no-sce
your kernel is too old. If you install OpenWRT you can use CAKE. It does use max. 1% of your routers CPU.Im guessing my ac68u isnt powerful enough to run this and is why its not 'supported'.
No, firewall-start still does not execute upon reboot. It will execute if I manually restart firewalld.Maybe run dos2unix against the script with the startup line in it. Example dos2unix /jffs/scripts/firewall-start
No, firewall-start still does not execute upon reboot. It will execute if I manually restart firewalld.
I tried reformatting /jffs and the USB sticks and reinstalling everything. Still does not start upon reboot.
Looks like I'll have to factory reset next and see. Perhaps it is a bug in 384.18_beta1.
#!/bin/sh
for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 # wait about 1 min
do
if [ -f /opt/bin/sh ]; then
/jffs/scripts/cake-qos start 115Mbit 11Mbit "docsis ack-filter"
exit
else
sleep 10
fi
logger -t "CakeWait" "/opt never come up, no cake for you..."
done
Thank you, just to confirm - will the update option check all components so simply running that will update everything in future or is it only cake binaries as implied by the ReadMe?
So, I created a quick shell script to wait for opt to get mounted then run cake-qos start. Works fine now. Hopefully the cake-qos guys can add something similar.
Code:#!/bin/sh for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 # wait about 1 min do if [ -f /opt/bin/sh ]; then /jffs/scripts/cake-qos start 115Mbit 11Mbit "docsis ack-filter" exit else sleep 10 fi logger -t "CakeWait" "/opt never come up, no cake for you..." done
maybe post-mount should be used?I was experiencing a similar issue. AX88u running 384.18_beta1.
What I believe is happening is that /opt is not mounted quick enough. In my case, I have disk check enabled on amtm. As a result, a boot/reboot takes longer to mount /opt (entware).
So, I created a quick shell script to wait for opt to get mounted then run cake-qos start. Works fine now. Hopefully the cake-qos guys can add something similar.
Code:#!/bin/sh for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 # wait about 1 min do if [ -f /opt/bin/sh ]; then /jffs/scripts/cake-qos start 115Mbit 11Mbit "docsis ack-filter" exit else sleep 10 fi logger -t "CakeWait" "/opt never come up, no cake for you..." done
I was experiencing a similar issue. AX88u running 384.18_beta1.
What I believe is happening is that /opt is not mounted quick enough. In my case, I have disk check enabled on amtm. As a result, a boot/reboot takes longer to mount /opt (entware).
So, I created a quick shell script to wait for opt to get mounted then run cake-qos start. Works fine now. Hopefully the cake-qos guys can add something similar.
Simply adding the following to post-mount works with the original firewall-start script.maybe post-mount should be used?
service restart_firewall
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!