KingBravery
Senior Member
Finally, I can choose between ROG theme or Merlin theme for AX11000.. Thanks RMerlin..
Note that this is still experimental, I haven`t made a final decision yet on whether I will keep supporting both UIs. I implemented a way for my build script to compile both images one after another and bundle them into the same archive, but what remains to be seen is how much extra work it will be to maintain both UIs.Finally, I can choose between ROG theme or Merlin theme for AX11000.. Thanks RMerlin..
Sure does.I assume for the bravest, that a reset to defaults is necessary, given the jump from 386 to 388?
Man, you must be a Canadian millionaire! That ain't a cheap router. I'm hoping the Asus overlords hook you up.I was already using a GT-AXE16000 as my primary router for a while now
Every 5 minutes (exactly, to the second) now.Seeing a lot of this on 388 alpha. (Every two minutes).
Otherwise, everything working well.
Maybe I’ll do a reset later?
(FWIW, the uidivstats script has ceased operations….. inconvenient, but not a show stopper)
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: Unhandled fault: alignment fault (0x92000021) at 0x00000000ff96eeab
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: potentially unexpected fatal signal 7.
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 14531 Comm: awk Tainted: P O 4.1.51 #2
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: Hardware name: Broadcom-v8A (DT)
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: task: ffffffc02f3eebc0 ti: ffffffc015318000 task.ti: ffffffc015318000
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: PC is at 0x738c0
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: LR is at 0x62d98
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: pc : [<00000000000738c0>] lr : [<0000000000062d98>] pstate: a00b0010
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: sp : 00000000ff96eaa8
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x12: 0000000000000000
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x11: 00000000ff96eacc x10: 00000000ff96ead0
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x9 : 00000000ff96ead4 x8 : 0000000000000002
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x7 : 00000000ff96ec84 x6 : 00000000ff96ec98
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x5 : 00000000000a0000 x4 : 00000000001391d8
Oct 13 07:42:00 kernel: x3 : 00000000ff96eeab x2 : 0000000000000000
Oct 13 07:42:01 kernel: x1 : 00000000ffffffff x0 : 00000000ff96eacc
LOL! Classic Matt Damon.fortune favors the brave
No, not that much has changed at the settings level.I assume for the bravest, that a reset to defaults is necessary, given the jump from 386 to 388?
All my development routers are provided by Asus.Man, you must be a Canadian millionaire! That ain't a cheap router. I'm hoping the Asus overlords hook you up.
Wow, as usual, a simple statement that says so much. Can we take that to mean that you feel that at this point in time, and for that amount of money, we could be building better routers on an (x86?) mini-PC platform? Sure, we would likely still need separate APs, but those are fairly low cost devices now.All my development routers are provided by Asus.
I wouldn't spend over $200 on a router, I would spend it on a fanless mini PC instead.
The current problem is that Internet connection speed is growing faster than the CPU speed on these routers. Over the past 5 years, Broadcom only increased their CPU clocks by 400 MHz, and are still using the same B53 core. Sure, with their runner/archer technology you can hit > 1 Gbps, but that means you basically have to give up on any advanced feature that would require disabling that hardware acceleration. For instance, that top-of-the-line router I'm currently using cannot even handle my 400 Mbps connection without runner enabled. That means I cannot use Traditional QoS, Cake, or Wireguard on it. And any IDS/IPS is limited to what little can be provided by Trend Micro's bwdpi, which didn't seem to be getting any real improvement since the initial launch back in 2014. When was the last time someone saw Trend Micro report a security issue that isnt 10+ years old, like that bogus Netcore issue they frequently report?Wow, as usual, a simple statement that says so much. Can we take that to mean that you feel that at this point in time, and for that amount of money, we could be building better routers on an (x86?) mini-PC platform?
You can get a mini PC that draws less than 50W that would run circles around any Broadcom/Qualcomm based router. I have a Quotom i5-5200U here that I occasionally use to run VMs on it, that CPU has a TDP of 15W. I don't know what kind of routing throughput I'd be able to manage from it, but I suspect it would be faster than 400 Mbps.Hum...something to mull over, even if that mini-PC would likely consume more power, it's tempting.
elegantly understated... like a billboard...<snip> I wouldn't spend over $200 on a router, I would spend it on a fanless mini PC instead.
Not everyone is in the same situation as me. I can't really afford such an expensive router, and I have the know-how to go down the DIY route. That's might not be the case for everyone else however.elegantly understated... like a billboard...
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!