TDMA = time division multiplexing, each channel/client gets a time slice "guaranteed" in the link bandwidth.
Transfer between any two ports on the switch will be at line speed - e.g. 1Gb/s. The port that connects to the router connecting to the modem (ATT) would have to handle all 8-11 video feeds at one time (roughly) . Not an issue for Gbit ethernet. The 10Mb/s cell upload bandwidth will throttle the combined feed. The switch and the router have very limited buffering capability. Packets will be lost, video frames dropped, unusable. Maybe you could stream 2-3 cameras. The video would need to be highly compressed to fit within the available bandwidth, say a 100- 400Mbit/s stream for each.
i would ask ATT what they can guarantee for their upload bandwidth on a sustained, continuous basis to confirm the 10 Mbit/s. You may have to talk with level 2 or 3 tech support or engineering.
So one way to solve your upload bandwidth issue is to have a local recorder storing x days of video. Locate this on the ethernet before you go to the modem - on a port of the top level switch. When you dial in to see video, you are looking at any one of the video feeds recorded and maybe one or two live streams. All of your local networking (ethernet cabled) should be 1 Gb/s. Your individual video camera feeds will be however fast the environment allows the wireless signal to transfer between the camera and the switch.
More point to point wireless might be needed depending on environment and resulting transfer rates. Each time you go through a repeater, you loose 50% + overheads of available bandwidth if the point to point radio is not dedicated to that function.
If you happen to be close enough to a microwave station tower , you might be able to use that instead of cell for the upload. i believe that would be through the commercial rather than residential service group.
Transfer between any two ports on the switch will be at line speed - e.g. 1Gb/s. The port that connects to the router connecting to the modem (ATT) would have to handle all 8-11 video feeds at one time (roughly) . Not an issue for Gbit ethernet. The 10Mb/s cell upload bandwidth will throttle the combined feed. The switch and the router have very limited buffering capability. Packets will be lost, video frames dropped, unusable. Maybe you could stream 2-3 cameras. The video would need to be highly compressed to fit within the available bandwidth, say a 100- 400Mbit/s stream for each.
i would ask ATT what they can guarantee for their upload bandwidth on a sustained, continuous basis to confirm the 10 Mbit/s. You may have to talk with level 2 or 3 tech support or engineering.
So one way to solve your upload bandwidth issue is to have a local recorder storing x days of video. Locate this on the ethernet before you go to the modem - on a port of the top level switch. When you dial in to see video, you are looking at any one of the video feeds recorded and maybe one or two live streams. All of your local networking (ethernet cabled) should be 1 Gb/s. Your individual video camera feeds will be however fast the environment allows the wireless signal to transfer between the camera and the switch.
More point to point wireless might be needed depending on environment and resulting transfer rates. Each time you go through a repeater, you loose 50% + overheads of available bandwidth if the point to point radio is not dedicated to that function.
If you happen to be close enough to a microwave station tower , you might be able to use that instead of cell for the upload. i believe that would be through the commercial rather than residential service group.