LighthammerX
Occasional Visitor
Greetings,
I did some research on this forum and other sites on this topic, so if I am asking information that does exist and I missed, I apologize ahead of time; though this is a fairly esoteric situation.
I've been running a server setup running FTP, Emby, HTTP and a few other services over a Comcast 150 mbps connection for the last several years.
My apartment complex abruptly terminated Comcast's ability to provide internet to our complex without notice and, only after proding to find out what happened in part with Comcast's help, did we actually find out that they pulled the hardware out that allows Comcast to connect here and replaced it with a very insecure setup that is essentially four or so commercial Cisco switches serviced by a dedicated fiber optic line connected through a DFOG (Fiber Optic Router).
This setup has made it impossible for me to run my network the way I had. Worse yet, the performance over the network is absolutely abysmal. It's not simply that the speed or latency is bad, its also the fact the network forces me to send any network traffic all the way down to their switch and back up to computers in the apartment. That means any of these services I mentioned above, as well as such things as my network printer or my software KVM are exposed to the network and forced to travel the 5,000 feet or so down to the network switch and back. The in-network latency is over 5000 ms.
From my point of view, what I need to do is get my router running in such a way that I can make only the router exposed to the network and assign IP Addresses to devices on my own network via the DHCP on the router.
The company does not seem willing to help in assigning a static IP address to my router, but I can define one as well as a gateway (I have lists of the working gateways).
The odd problem I am having is, while my router is in "Router Mode", it can see the network, it can ping out, tracert out, netstat as well as all the usual commands, but any computers connected to the router can not access the internet.
I can place my router into "Access Point (AP)" mode and all computers can access the network, but since this turns off the DHCP of my router, I can't get any of my services to work. As described above, most my devices are being forced to run down to the network closet and run through their switch. This makes even running a Chromecast non-viable.
What I need is the correct setup to make my devices work "normally" behind the router so that only the router is exposed to the network. I have no issues assigning ports to the server as needed.
Essentially, I want the router to give me the same protection as if the Comcast Cable Modem was plugged in; except now, I have a network cable running to the site's switch plugged in.
On the administrative side of things, I'm already working with Comcast, the FCC and my state's Attorney General's Office to resolve what happened; but in the mean time, I'm hoping to set something viable up.
Thanks very much for any advice you guys can give and thanks very much for getting through this entire post (I know its long, I hope I explained the situation well enough to give advice).
I did some research on this forum and other sites on this topic, so if I am asking information that does exist and I missed, I apologize ahead of time; though this is a fairly esoteric situation.
I've been running a server setup running FTP, Emby, HTTP and a few other services over a Comcast 150 mbps connection for the last several years.
My apartment complex abruptly terminated Comcast's ability to provide internet to our complex without notice and, only after proding to find out what happened in part with Comcast's help, did we actually find out that they pulled the hardware out that allows Comcast to connect here and replaced it with a very insecure setup that is essentially four or so commercial Cisco switches serviced by a dedicated fiber optic line connected through a DFOG (Fiber Optic Router).
This setup has made it impossible for me to run my network the way I had. Worse yet, the performance over the network is absolutely abysmal. It's not simply that the speed or latency is bad, its also the fact the network forces me to send any network traffic all the way down to their switch and back up to computers in the apartment. That means any of these services I mentioned above, as well as such things as my network printer or my software KVM are exposed to the network and forced to travel the 5,000 feet or so down to the network switch and back. The in-network latency is over 5000 ms.
From my point of view, what I need to do is get my router running in such a way that I can make only the router exposed to the network and assign IP Addresses to devices on my own network via the DHCP on the router.
The company does not seem willing to help in assigning a static IP address to my router, but I can define one as well as a gateway (I have lists of the working gateways).
The odd problem I am having is, while my router is in "Router Mode", it can see the network, it can ping out, tracert out, netstat as well as all the usual commands, but any computers connected to the router can not access the internet.
I can place my router into "Access Point (AP)" mode and all computers can access the network, but since this turns off the DHCP of my router, I can't get any of my services to work. As described above, most my devices are being forced to run down to the network closet and run through their switch. This makes even running a Chromecast non-viable.
What I need is the correct setup to make my devices work "normally" behind the router so that only the router is exposed to the network. I have no issues assigning ports to the server as needed.
Essentially, I want the router to give me the same protection as if the Comcast Cable Modem was plugged in; except now, I have a network cable running to the site's switch plugged in.
On the administrative side of things, I'm already working with Comcast, the FCC and my state's Attorney General's Office to resolve what happened; but in the mean time, I'm hoping to set something viable up.
Thanks very much for any advice you guys can give and thanks very much for getting through this entire post (I know its long, I hope I explained the situation well enough to give advice).