It could be that an AC86U may have outperformed an AX86U in my environment as well. But I chose to go for the newer product for several reasons - reported heating issues, WiFi 6 support, likely longer product support life. And it turned out to be a substantial upgrade that did what I wanted it to do.BCM4366E (AC86U, AC 4x4) outperforms BCM43684 (AX86U, AX 4x4) in my environment as well. AX86U with it's 4x4 radio has the same range as AX20 with built-in SoC BCM6755 2x2 radio. Go figure. Perhaps there are other design elements in play here, not only the environment. By the way, some TP-Link routers have very high quality printed PCB antennas. High quality in sense well engineered.
I also don't recommend AC86U for multiple reasons:
Want to add new RT-AC86U to existing network as AIMesh node
I have a working RT-AC86U router and want to add a NIB 86U as an AIMesh node, but am a bit confused as to how to start, since I know the first thing I need to do is to get the new router firmware to update. Do I have to disconnect my Primary router and plug the new one's WAN port to my ISP...www.snbforums.com
On top of that - it's on life support stuck to 386 firmware.
Yeah. I think TP-Link routers are a great value. Just relatively light on features and firmware updates. So I wouldn't buy one as long as I can afford better.As I read through these countless comments, I've yet to hear from members that own a TP-Link router which was the purpose of this posting, LOL. My desire is to improve range of AC68P and future proof with WiFi 6. Thanks so much!
I've yet to hear from members that own a TP-Link router
I appreciate the response and recommendations. At the end of the day, it appears that there are countless elements in an environment that dictate a router's range. And comments stating use of a phone as indicator has me wonder whether a something newer will actually make a difference. Regardless, I'm grateful for the feedback.The members of this forum use mostly Asus and Netgear home routers. Wrong place to ask questions about TP-Link.
One more question if you don't mind. I've read L&D's settings recommendations for the RT-AC68U which include disabling all the beam forming settings. I own a OnePlus 8 phone which has very good hardware specs and wonder if enabling one or more of the beam forming settings might improve its reception. ThanksThe members of this forum use mostly Asus and Netgear home routers. Wrong place to ask questions about TP-Link.
I have several TP-Link routers (currently mainly ER605/TL-R605) that I use for other purposes (I used to use models with Wifi but they quickly lost manufacturer support and did not receive firmware updates).I've yet to hear from members that own a TP-Link router
Thanks..I currently have both AC and Universal beam forming disabled since that's what others have recommended. I just tried enabling AC beam forming and the signal strength seemed to have lessened. Thanks anyway802.11ax/ac Beamforming - Enable
Universal Beamforming - Disable
Very interesting..when I checked the WiFi analyzer I noticed nearly all neighbor signals on the 80 mHz bandwidth so I changed mine to 40..I'll turn AC beamforming on and see what happens.It is difficult for me to clearly state whether there is an improvement - I do not have the possibility to conduct laboratory tests.
Look: https://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-features/does-beamforming-really-work/
and https://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-howto/how-we-test-wifi-revision-11/
One more thing, I think this will work better for devices that do not change their position. You move your phone all the time to a different place, so you will not gain coverage this way.
I noticed nearly all neighbor signals on the 80 mHz bandwidth so I changed mine to 40.
Thanks again for the advice..I'll look into the AX73 though I feel the AX55 might be adequate since I only have 3 devices using WiFi due to the power line network. BTW, I use a Roku Ultra for streaming and after changing the beamforming/channel bandwidth settings, I logged it into the 5 gHz band and it showed 'excellent' in the connection quality settings.40mhz is 80mhz. It shares bonding with the wider channels.
Turning off/disabling 80mhz will improve SNR, but local interference won't change and you will obviously loose throughput, max speed and innately increase latency from using a smaller channel width.
Just buy a 4x4 5G AX router and call it a day... You won't have to worry about "what could have been" and you'll have something fairly decent relative to the entire WIFI market.
If you're set on TPLINK, the AX73 is 4x4 BCM43684 + 2x2 BCM6750 A7 SoC. Amazon is selling it for $139.99 USD.. You can find better value elsewhere, but that seems to be the lowest end 4x4 5G offering from this company.
I only have 3 devices using WiFi
Thanks again for the advice..I'll look into the AX73 though I feel the AX55 might be adequate since I only have 3 devices using WiFi due to the power line network. BTW, I use a Roku Ultra for streaming and after changing the beamforming/channel bandwidth settings, I logged it into the 5 gHz band and it showed 'excellent' in the connection quality settings.
I have a 300 mbps Internet connection and live in a 1000 sq ft condo where there is lots of congestion.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!