Smokey613
Very Senior Member
Thanks @SomeWhereOverTheRainBow for the offer.
I'm still undecided if I should take down the script and walk way, given I'm saddened and disappointed to have been accused of having an 'ego' by @kernol (as unofficial spokesperson for the community?), when I became an unfortunate whistle-blower by simply diligently reiterating that the integrity of users' routers be held paramount
i.e. version control and accountability is mandatory when silently uploading experimental configuration files to the users' environment.
I hope you continue with the project. I personally do not care about the “add ons” ie. ADBlock or Firefox stuff, I just want a good high performance recursive dns server. Having been an alpha/beta tester for several projects in years past, I agree on precise documentation on any changes. If this is not done then you cannot determine which changes provided an improvement and which did not. You wind up doing a lot of guessing and eventually wind up with a big mess. This documentation is even more important when there are several collaborators. One would have to question the reason for any opposition to precise change control documentation. Without such documentation, it quickly becomes an exercise in futility.