When I enable URL-filter, I lost my IPv6 connectivity (RT-N66U, 6rd). If I disable URL-filter, it works again, enable again and IPv6 lost again.
When URL-filter is disabled my laptop shows in IPv6 log page, but when I enable URL-filter it disappears.
I'm generally pretty good at this kind of thing (and it was working under tomato, and other HW before the Asus, I've done it before.)
Any non-obvious (or even obvious) reason it might not pass 27030:27039 TCP, 27000:27015 and 1200 UDP? Seems straight forward, tried multiple times, resets, different ways of specifying them (actually don't need the whole range, so did explicit ports.)
Seem in DMZ with no firewall, there should be no possible way to screw it up.
FWIW, inside the LAN, works as expected.
I have a lot of this, and I know it's reported problem, 378_50_ta.
On one router 378_50 and no such behave.
I'm using vlan10 on iptv, internet VID 10 prio 0
Could anyone compare the new wifi performance to the old 374.43 build (and older ones)?
Thanks.
This release has fixed a great many issues for me, and i know that Asus and Merlin have been working hard on this error:
Feb 7 22:46:09 kernel: br0: received packet on vlan1 with own address as source address
Feb 7 22:47:04 kernel: br0: received packet on vlan1 with own address as source address
Feb 7 22:47:48 kernel: br0: received packet on vlan1 with own address as source address
However in my case it hasn't gone, but what was interesting, i didn't have the error with the current Asus firmware ending .3885
Regards
AC56U, updated from Beta 2, factory reset, restored manually all the settings, it has been working great for the last 10 hours, with all the AiSecurity settings turned on.
There is a bug: whenever I go to the Traffic Analyzer page, that stalls the asuswrt webpage; Internet works fine, but I cannot access the router anymore via the configuration page, it's accessible only via telnet. Works fine after a reboot, as long as I don't go to that Traffic page again!
Will any improvements be noticeable on the AC66U since it won't get the TA?
Call me crazy but for my RT-AC87 the RT-AC87U_3.0.0.4_378.50_beta3b_ta firmware runs faster than the released .50. Also you have the traffic analyzer.
Merlin whats the exact difference between the released and this version. It is based on same code correct?
Ran the released version and returned to the beta version and it is running perfectly.
CC
commit 0669660b5b037f9c34c5e644ce2d23aa7d67fc06
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 21:42:08 2015 -0500
Tagged version with _ta
commit 751831697c33f4e73297b512508935f209c6e74c
Merge: 8f9dc6e 91d4c78
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 21:41:13 2015 -0500
Merge branch 'master' into analyzer
Conflicts:
README-merlin.txt
commit 91d4c78d5fe3ed6d596d14dad4a90e6ab42314ae
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 20:39:18 2015 -0500
Bumped revision to 378.50 final
commit 8f9dc6e8465b920126a0dc675a2f8d8cec5d1051
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 02:07:54 2015 -0500
Updated documentation
commit 64690f95070d23c5bc765e76ed0d2943d1c66e7b
Merge: e49f601 5093494
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 02:06:20 2015 -0500
Merge branch 'master' into analyzer
commit 50934942b9206eaa95b5fdd2e1075d517b48703c
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Fri Feb 6 02:04:43 2015 -0500
Merged with GPL 378_4129
commit 48912a295b8e8543fad49904367d6b016e0c881d
Author: Eric Sauvageau <rmerl@lostrealm.ca>
Date: Thu Feb 5 23:58:10 2015 -0500
Reverting in favor of upstream version.
Any chances for alternative hosting? mediafire gives <5kBps transfer rate...
EDIT: it gives 0kpbs speed, downloading the FW is simply impossible, maybe any donators link?
First of all Merlin, let me thank you for all the help and great firmware you have given us.
Now, if I have some other cascading Router from a RT-AC87U, firmware 378.50, do any or all of these options work (transfer)to the Cascaded Router?
No idea, you will have to try. I suspect that some of the AiProtection features might work, but others won't.
Must have been a temporary or an ISP issue, because for most people it downloads at pretty high speed (it maxes out my 30 Mbits connection here).
Firmware downloads generate 500-700 GB of traffic per month. I can't put these files just anywhere, so I'm paying for the file locker that gave the best performance when I looked for one. Other file lockers are plagued with ads, even slower speeds (capping at 30/50 KB/s for downloaders without an account), Captcha and other unwanted critters.
I will try this later on when I install the Cascading router if I the NEW RT-AC87U does not reach that end of the house.
Another one....
I Just replaced a RT-N66U for the AC87U. We have cameras that worked fine on the N66U on using both the internal 192.168.10.152 and though the Static IP xx.xxx.xx.xx:8152.
Now I can't get the cameras through the Static IP address to come up. I have looked evreywhere (~enable the Web access from WAN 8080) with no avail.
The new AC87U has some different features that I have to get used to, could you please point me in a direction on why the cameras are not coming up through the Static IP?
Thanks again,
Regards.-
So if I upgrade from 376.49_5 to one of the 50 betas, then upgrade to the final release, I don't need to perform a factory default reset?
RT-N66U
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!