mikelees2
Regular Contributor
Oh, huh, I totally missed the memo that Asus had KOed those--thanks for the info. It's unfortunate that SNB deleted the thread that discusses this--I totally understand that they don't support discussion of circumventing things, but I'm genuinely curious what it was that changed here, and that discussion appears to have been deleted in the crossfire.
So, that brings up what I do moving forward. I run my ex-TM device purely as an access point. It's connected via hardwire to my router, so I don't care about things like AiMesh.
Is there any real security concern with leaving an AP's firmware static? I would never dream of leaving a router unpatched, but do APs get meaningful security updates sometimes too or are they essentially just dumb portals?
I am holding my ex-TM at 384.4_2. It runs fine with that and as an AP it still has the security of the RT-AC5300 on the front side to protect the infrastructure that is behind it. I don't think you have to be concerned as much with an AP behind your main router as you would if it was the main router.
I would not have an issue evan going back to the stock firmware but it was never updated by TM from the day I got it and at that time it was my main router. I have too much invested to use a router that I can't update as my front door. I upgraded to the RT-AC5300 because of the amount of hackers trying to access my network and a close call. Now they still try but are stopped in there tracks. This still is no guarantee someone won't get in but I do sleep better knowing that I have the best setup for my family's usage and have done everything I could do to protect myself from that.