Spartanjet
New Around Here
I just set up my BE98 Pro it works perfectly. I also got prompted to update the firmware which did not give me any issues.
My idea for this router is its more powerfull to control my 10gb/10gb conection (more stable) i dont really care about the wifi stuff, i only need 800 to 1000mb over wifi for ipads, iphones etc, hope its a litle more powerfull then my GTAXE16000
If memory serves, I think I read on Dong Knows review of the BE96, that it's capable of 6.5 Gigs, while the AXE16000 taps out at about 6. So better, but only slightly. It was also suggested that ASUS was working on something to improve speeds to more than 6, but dunno what became of that. With that said, I'd think the BE98 Pro, would do about 6.5 too. Not 10 Gigs, but close enough that it'd take AT&T Fiber's 5 Gig package and a little more. Not bad for a consumer unit.
This makes a lot of sense and was the reason I went ahead and bought a set of routers. I currently have the BE96U, well 4 of them actually. They replaced my AXE-11000s. I utilize them as a mesh. However, seeing that BE98 Pro is only $100 more, it seems that maybe I should return them and go with it instead. I use a wireless backhaul currently and basically get full gigabit speeds at each of the nodes now that my units are WiFi 7. Do you have any thoughts about if it makes more sense to get the BE98 Pro since the price is not much different? Seems like port wise it's more future proof for if I decide to do any upgrades in the future.Wait for more users to actually try the current generation of Wifi 7 devices to see what their experience is like. Wifi 7 hardware relies heavily on Wifi 6e`s 6 GHz band, so that part has been tried and tested for a few years already. MLO would be the big Wifi 7 change that might prove tricky, or be MIA on some devices (I believe in Asus' case, they stated it would be added to their device at the end of 2023 or in Q1 2024).
Right now, there is no reported reason to avoid getting Wifi 7 router. But more feedback would be helpful before making a purchase decision, so waiting a few weeks or a few months just to see more reviews and user experiences might be a good idea, considering how expensive these routers are.
IEEE finalization of the standard is a non-issue. At this stage it`s largely a marketing/political issue, not a technical one. Just like Wifi 6, the last year or so is wasted debating on minor details such as "should we rephrase this sentence in the specifications document to clarify this or that", with the voters only meeting every 2-3 months to take new votes. The technical portions of the standard have been finalized long ago. Otherwise, companies like Qualcomm and Broadcom wouldn`t have invested millions in selling products to ODMs. The industry learned since the K56Flex days.
This makes a lot of sense and was the reason I went ahead and bought a set of routers. I currently have the BE96U, well 4 of them actually. They replaced my AXE-11000s. I utilize them as a mesh. However, seeing that BE98 Pro is only $100 more, it seems that maybe I should return them and go with it instead. I use a wireless backhaul currently and basically get full gigabit speeds at each of the nodes now that my units are WiFi 7. Do you have any thoughts about if it makes more sense to get the BE98 Pro since the price is not much different? Seems like port wise it's more future proof for if I decide to do any upgrades in the future.
I guess I was also thinking about the fact that there's an extra 6ghz band which will probably get more use in the future. I use it for my backhaul and get full gigabit speeds at each node right now. However, as more 6ghz devices come out, I'd have to share that backhaul bandwidth on the BE96U whereas with the BE98 Pro I could use one for backhaul and the other for devices to connect to. Had I built my house I'd have just had ethernet installed in every room. The geniuses who built it did not do so though. Seems like in 2016 that'd be a no brainer. Small town and the people here who do the installs say my house is too complex to install ethernet now because of the firewalls so I'm stuck with a wireless backhaul.The 96U has two 10G ports, so you can always buy an external switch if you need it.
A 6-port 2.5G fanless switch costs about $50. If you want to go for a 10G switch, you can do it without replacing the router, and you might get better speeds between the wired connections on the external switch.
There are some advantages to going with the internal switch, like less clutter, but I wouldn't describe it as futureproofing.
A quad-band router like the GT-BE98 Pro would make a lot of sense if you're doing full wireless backhaul but using the one of the 6Ghz bands for that purpose may not be a good idea given the short range it has. But I guess if you get four GT-BE98 Pros like in your current configuration, that should resolve the range issue. The ROG units also come with the RangeBoost feature which helps increase wireless coverage. I've experienced that on the ROG GT-AXE16000 so it works pretty well apparently.I guess I was also thinking about the fact that there's an extra 6ghz band which will probably get more use in the future. I use it for my backhaul and get full gigabit speeds at each node right now. However, as more 6ghz devices come out, I'd have to share that backhaul bandwidth on the BE96U whereas with the BE98 Pro I could use one for backhaul and the other for devices to connect to. Had I built my house I'd have just had ethernet installed in every room. The geniuses who built it did not do so though. Seems like in 2016 that'd be a no brainer. Small town and the people here who do the installs say my house is too complex to install ethernet now because of the firewalls so I'm stuck with a wireless backhaul.
Yeah I worried about the short range when I first got my AXE-11000s because I kept reading it in reviews, but honestly it's been just as good as 5ghz was when I had my AX-11000s. It took 4 of those to cover my house too just because of how it's built. I gradually worked my way up from 2 units and had to keep adding more because of dead spots. Cell service at the time sucked so I couldn't make phone calls without wifi calling. Needed full coverage since I'm on call for work a lot.A quad-band router like the GT-BE98 Pro would make a lot of sense if you're doing full wireless backhaul but using the one of the 6Ghz bands for that purpose may not be a good idea given the short range it has. But I guess if you get four GT-BE98 Pros like in your current configuration, that should resolve the range issue. The ROG units also come with the RangeBoost feature which helps increase wireless coverage. I've experienced that on the ROG GT-AXE16000 so it works pretty well apparently.
What's stopped me from getting the GT-BE98/Pro is that they replaced the initially planned third 10Gbe port with four 2.5Gbe ones. I'm on 10G wired ethernet backhaul and was hoping to retire my 10Gbe switch and rely entirely on the GT-BE98/Pro for switching operations.
That makes sense. I sure can't tell any difference between the two. I feel like 6ghz is superior because it's covering the same but I'm not dealing with interference.The spread from 5GHz to 6GHz isn't important in RF except theoretically.
I would expect both to cover almost identical areas in a given location.
The spread from 5GHz to 6GHz isn't important in RF except theoretically.
I would expect both to cover almost identical areas in a given location.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!