CaptnDanLKW
Senior Member
I picked up a used RT-AC88U (probably from someone here since it had 384.14_b1 on it). Two benefits are for better range in the house and for the 8 ports.
Current config
2x RT-AC86U AI Mesh (Ethernet Backhaul) and Smart Connect
~25 Wifi Clients (6 on Isolated Guest network, they happen to be furthest away from the Main router)
~12 Hard Wired Clients (couple of 8 port switches in use)
Trend Micro AI Protection & all data stats enabled
USB 3.0 drive for backups and occasional DLNA picture viewing
Entware Runing off usb2 stick
Scribe, ScribeUI, Speedtest and ConMon addons.
No QOS (600mbit/10mbit service)
I know the 88U is much older hardware, where the CPU does not have the AES acceleration, it's based on the older 2.6.x kernel, much more of the config is stored in NVRAM (vs moving values to JFFS).
As I redo my setup it's feeling like I'm going backwards, I mean I know I am, but maybe I'm over thinking it. However, I am planning on Skynet and Diversion in the future...
Anyone here ever make the jump backwards? Just curious.
Current config
2x RT-AC86U AI Mesh (Ethernet Backhaul) and Smart Connect
~25 Wifi Clients (6 on Isolated Guest network, they happen to be furthest away from the Main router)
~12 Hard Wired Clients (couple of 8 port switches in use)
Trend Micro AI Protection & all data stats enabled
USB 3.0 drive for backups and occasional DLNA picture viewing
Entware Runing off usb2 stick
Scribe, ScribeUI, Speedtest and ConMon addons.
No QOS (600mbit/10mbit service)
I know the 88U is much older hardware, where the CPU does not have the AES acceleration, it's based on the older 2.6.x kernel, much more of the config is stored in NVRAM (vs moving values to JFFS).
As I redo my setup it's feeling like I'm going backwards, I mean I know I am, but maybe I'm over thinking it. However, I am planning on Skynet and Diversion in the future...
Anyone here ever make the jump backwards? Just curious.