Your good. Normal.View attachment 53591
Normal? Only Diversion running. I mean I know my previous 1900P was short on memory it was a known fact and I thought this very recent model would be ok about memory.
Please remember router firmware is based on linux so memory is managed completely differently as in windows ...View attachment 53591
Normal? Only Diversion running. I mean I know my previous 1900P was short on memory it was a known fact and I thought this very recent model would be ok about memory.
May I ask what kind of load did you do to make the router swap? Or did you alter swappiness?for real mem consumtion use htop:
View attachment 53593
in my case really used memory is 601M rest are disk buffers ...
It's already fixed in 3006, they probably forgot to backport the fix to 3004.It’s a missing model check in this function. I’m sure Asus will eventually fix it.
Nice utility to have installed. I also saw in some discussions (can remember where) there were graphs...any idea how that is accomplished?for real mem consumtion use htop:
View attachment 53593
in my case really used memory is 601M rest are disk buffers ...
good pointfor real mem consumtion use htop:
View attachment 53593
in my case really used memory is 601M rest are disk buffers ...
Try installing scMerlin.Nice utility to have installed. I also saw in some discussions (can remember where) there were graphs...any idea how that is accomplished?
Oct 16 22:12:03 kernel: ^[[0;33;41m[ERROR pktrunner] runnerUcast_inetaddr_event,181: Could not rdpa_system_ipv4_host_address_table_add ret=-3^[[0m
The strange thing is that even if I disable pktrunner via SSH it still throws those errors when using the WG Server and multiple WG Clients.pktrunner is closed source and outside of my control.
I had issues when I did a dirty flash from 386.7_2 to 3004.388.4_0 on my AX86U. Ended up doing a factory reset and reconfiguring from scratch. Now my network is the most stable its been in the three years I've had this configuration.Ugh, I tried doing some mild searches.. but anyhoo I'm on 386.7 on my AX86U... any reservations or things I should take heed of before upgrading to 3004.388.4_0 ??
I'm a good to go? Is it safe to do a straight dirty flash from 386.7 to 3004.388.4_0 on the AX86U ??
I could not find anything that would advise against it necessarily, I'll probably go ahead and try it... lest someone may suggest that I should perhaps upgrade sequentially before making the jump?
TIA
Hi, i wonder if anyone can help diagnose an issue I keep encountering.
I have 2x XT12 flashed from the stock firmware to 3004.388.4_0
All is typically well but randomly after a couple of days of uptime (in this occurrence almost 4 days) I get a reboot of the primary router, for instance it crashed/rebooted whilst updating a game on steam. When it restarted connection to the node is strong and it's back in business. If the router doesn't reboot everything is solid, no weird behaviour at all.
These are the router logs from the initial crash/reboot:
<snip>
Oct 18 20:53:15 roamast: eth4: disconnect weak signal strength station [xx:xx:xx:xx:75:2e]
Oct 18 20:53:15 roamast: eth4: remove client [xx:xx:xx:xx:75:2e] from monitor list
Oct 18 20:59:06 roamast: [EXAP]Deauth old sta in 1 0: xx:xx:xx:xx:AA:37
Oct 18 20:59:06 roamast: eth5: disconnect weak signal strength station [xx:xx:xx:xx:aa:37]
Oct 18 20:59:06 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(645): eth5: Deauth_ind xx:xx:xx:xx:AA:37, status: 0, reason: Previous authentication no longer valid (2), rssi:-75
Oct 18 20:59:06 roamast: eth5: remove client [xx:xx:xx:xx:aa:37] from monitor list
Oct 18 20:59:07 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(645): eth5: Deauth_ind xx:xx:xx:xx:AA:37, status: 0, reason: Previous authentication no longer valid (2), rssi:-75
<rebooted at this point>
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: klogd started: BusyBox v1.25.1 (2023-08-21 15:34:18 EDT)
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: Linux version 4.19.183 (merlin@ubuntu-dev) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Buildroot 2019.11.1)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Aug 21 15:34:47 EDT 2023
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: random: get_random_bytes called from start_kernel+0x9c/0x454 with crng_init=0
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: Kernel command line: coherent_pool=4M cpuidle_sysfs_switch pci=pcie_bus_safe console=ttyAMA0,115200 earlycon rootwait mtdparts=brcmnand.0:2097152(loader),264241152@2097152(image),524288@266338304(crashlog) root=/dev/ubiblock0_6 ubi.mtd=image ubi.block=0,6 rootfstype=squashfs cma=0M
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: mtusize 1500
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: CCI hardware cache coherency enabled
May 5 06:05:18 kernel: bootloader version U-Boot 2019.07 (Aug 21 2023 - 16:27:51 -0400), Build: 5.04L.0
<snip...and then back on-line>
May 5 06:05:54 rc_service: ip-up 2771:notify_rc stop_ntpd
May 5 06:05:54 rc_service: ip-up 2771:notify_rc start_ntpd
May 5 06:05:54 ntpd: Started ntpd
May 5 06:05:55 acsd: acs_start(737): cs scan failed ret code: -16
May 5 06:05:55 acsd: acs_init_run(1197): acs_start failed for ifname: eth6
Oct 18 21:57:06 ntpd: Initial clock set
Oct 18 21:57:06 WAN_Connection: WAN was restored.
Oct 18 21:57:08 GPY211: ### GPY211 WAR AUTO : eth3 ###
Apologies if this information doesn't help or I've included the wrong information, I replaced the MAC addresses with xx, but would appreciate any advice from the experts here.
I'm not using 160MHz or QoS. The 2.4/5GHz bands are separate, wireless backhaul enabled, all settings default to what I recall.
Thanks.
Hi, it is stated clearly in my post:I suggest you start your own thread for this. We will need to know what router and firmware version.
Hi, it is stated clearly in my post:
I have 2x XT12 flashed from the stock firmware to 3004.388.4_0
Thanks.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!