Gary_Dexter
Senior Member
Nope. Disabled.Do you have multicast routing enabled under IPTV in LAN settings?
These only started appearing following upgrading to _5 from _4
Nope. Disabled.Do you have multicast routing enabled under IPTV in LAN settings?
http://www.snbforums.com/threads/speed-diff-for-openvpn-on-rt-ac68u-and-rt-ac86u.77523/post-748840I upgraded a AC1900 aka AC68U from 386.4 to 386.5 and it was for the most part uneventful as usual. One thing that was unusual was at the end of the upgrade process it noted the need to manually reboot the router. Just as I was about to walk over to the router to do so, it magically rebooted by itself. Anyone have any thoughts as to why that appeared at the end of the upgrade process?
say that quietly, yest ye invoke @L&LDAll good over here! Sometimes the good ole nuclear option does the trick..
# nvram get nvgfn_ch_rulelist
audio>udp>49003<mic>udp>49004<video>udp>49005<control>tcp>49006
/* fixed ports */
fprintf(f, "$TFA parent 1: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport %d 0xffff flowid 1:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("audio"));
fprintf(f, "$TFA parent 1: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport %d 0xffff flowid 1:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("mic"));
fprintf(f, "$TFA parent 1: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport %d 0xffff flowid 1:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("vedio"));
fprintf(f, "$TFA parent 1: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport %d 0xffff flowid 1:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("control"));
fprintf(f, "$TFA parent 1: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 6 0xff match ip dport %d 0xffff flowid 1:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("control"));
/* fixed ports */
fprintf(f, "$TFAU parent 2: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip sport %d 0xffff flowid 2:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("audio"));
fprintf(f, "$TFAU parent 2: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip sport %d 0xffff flowid 2:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("mic"));
fprintf(f, "$TFAU parent 2: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip sport %d 0xffff flowid 2:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("vedio"));
fprintf(f, "$TFAU parent 2: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip sport %d 0xffff flowid 2:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("control"));
fprintf(f, "$TFAU parent 2: prio 10 protocol ip u32 match ip protocol 6 0xff match ip sport %d 0xffff flowid 2:10\n", nvfgn_GetQoSChannelPort("control"));
Thanks, I did just try that but no luck. I removed the USB drive and rebooted, then tried flashing again, but it just hangs at Applying... forever with no status change.Have you removed any USB attached devices first?
AFAIK This ^^ won't be fixed by Asus (and then in due course, Merlin...) until, Asus finalise and officially release their own 386.5 series of firmware. The latest official Asus release for my own router is covered in this thread but as you can see, it's still 386.4 series... Your own router will no doubt have a different Asus release, but isn't it also, 386.4 series firmware?Hi @RMerlin I have just updated 386.4 > 386.5 (dirty) and was hoping the the asuscomm DDNS would now be working on IPv6, however I can only find my address on IPv4. I know that you disabled this in the previous release inadyn: rc: disable IPv6 support · RMerl/asuswrt-merlin.ng@8c0194d · GitHub, but I thought that the issue had been fixed in their firmware 3.0.0.4.386.46065 and would now be working.
Before I annoy my family by reverting to standard Asus, checking if it works there, and reverting can you confirm if you think that it should be working in 386.5.
Apart from this, everything appears to be working fine.
Thanks, Archiel
I had this happen when I upgraded my AC86U from 386.3 to 386.4. I disabled jffs scripts, rebooted, removed the usb stick, and then was able to flash the new firmware successfully. Then I reenabled jffs scripts, rebooted again, and all done.Thanks, I did just try that but no luck. I removed the USB drive and rebooted, then tried flashing again, but it just hangs at Applying... forever with no status change.
Jan 11 08:29:18 dnsmasq[2036]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted
Jan 11 08:29:18 dnsmasq[2036]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted
Jan 11 08:29:18 dnsmasq[2036]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted
Jan 11 08:29:18 dnsmasq[2036]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted
Jan 11 08:29:19 dnsmasq[2036]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted
dirty upgrade from 386.3.2 works great!
I do get this at the beginning of my logs after each reboot:
(there's a ton of them).
I had serious issues with WiFi 2.4GHz on 386.4, and numerous posts reported that also. So I downgraded back to 386.3.2, which is rock solid.I had this happen when I upgraded my AC86U from 386.3 to 386.4. I disabled jffs scripts, rebooted, removed the usb stick, and then was able to flash the new firmware successfully. Then I reenabled jffs scripts, rebooted again, and all done.
Haven't had to do any of that for upgrades since then - most recent one (from 386.4_alpha2 to 386.5) went without a hitch despite me forgetting to remove the usb stick. All stable on both router and node for the last 48 hours.
Did you try rebooting without a USB device attached, just before flashing?View attachment 40014
Started to upgrade my RT-AC86U from 386.4 to 386.5_0 and got this message. Never experienced an unsuccessful message before. Tried several times to upgrade but without a positive result. Any idea how to solve this.
Edit: Upgraded my RT-AC68U without any problem.
I'm running about a dozen IoT devices on my 2.4GHz guest network - connection for all of them has been stable since I flashed 368.5 two days ago. This includes my 'problem child' (TP-Link HS100 plug towards the edge of reception in the far corner of the garden), which has been connected for over 53 hours solid now.I had serious issues with WiFi 2.4GHz on 386.4, and numerous posts reported that also. So I downgraded back to 386.3.2, which is rock solid.
Would you be so kind, to report your experience with WiFi 2.4 GHz on 386.5. I do not want to upgrade prior positive reports, as my job is dependent on a 100% working WiFi.
Thanks. Removing the USB device was indeed the solution!Did you try rebooting without a USB device attached, just before flashing?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!