@GaselK, is this after a reboot?
384.16 flashed. Hardware defaults restored. Settings set manually.@GaselK, is this after a reboot?
@Torson, on you screenshot, I believe you download/uploads numbers are mixed. Is your upload really 150?@GaselK - therein lies the rub - we're comparing different entities (or adaptive QoS settings in this case.)
Mine are Manual bandwidth settings, fq_codel and customized mode. That being said, my test results were quite similar for automatic vs manual bandwidth setting. I chose the latter because it offers a subjective feel-good state of mind knowing that VoIP is at the top of the heap followed by streaming etc.
"New feature addition is very low on the list of priorities for this project.", may not apply so much any more.
What can cause this?Apr 16 19:57:43 syslog: WLCEVENTD wlceventd_proc_event(401): eth1: Disassoc 80:19:34:41:38:27, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8)
Apr 16 19:57:43 syslog: WLCEVENTD wlceventd_proc_event(420): eth1: Auth 80:19:34:41:38:27, status: 0, reason: d11 RC reserved (0)
Apr 16 19:57:43 syslog: WLCEVENTD wlceventd_proc_event(449): eth1: Assoc 80:19:34:41:38:27, status: 0, reason: d11 RC reserved (0)
Apr 16 19:57:43 dnsmasq-dhcp[357]: DHCPREQUEST(br0) 192.168.1.8 80:19:34:41:38:27
Apr 16 19:57:43 dnsmasq-dhcp[357]: DHCPACK(br0) 192.168.1.8 80:19:34:41:38:27 Andrei-PC
Thanks!Asus left debugging log enabled been talked about for awhile now. Nothing to sweat over ignore it.
What is this and how can i disable this script? I have latest Merlin and Skynet installed.Apr 16 21:51:21 rc_service: cfg_server 3946:notify_rc email_info
Apr 16 21:51:21 custom_script: Running /jffs/scripts/service-event (args: email_info)
Quite the opposite, it's even more valid today than 5 years ago. Back in the day I added a lot of major new features, like the whole OpenVPN support. Now, I haven't added any new big features since DoT, and that was last year.
The service-event script is needed for add-ons such as Skynet to pass commands from the GUI to the underlying scripts. If the service-event script isn’t written to “handle” an event like email_info, it will just end with no harm done. All service events are passed to this script if it exists, but not all are actioned within the script.Thanks!
Ok, one more question. Taken from same logs
What is this and how can i disable this script? I have latest Merlin and Skynet installed.
I'd consider incorporation of AMTM to be fairly major.
And it's better like that! You don't add bloatware, just nice and useful tingsIt's not a new feature, it's just that an existing script was added to the firmware image. There hasn't been a single line of code change by me for that. Code changes are the main problem with adding new features - the further away from Asus's code I get, the harder it is for me to keep my code in sync with theirs. Therefore, I try to do a minimum of code changes to anything that is linked to their own code.
I called my ISP, basically all I can do is enable DMZ.His ISP may be like many were there modem/Gateway is required for authentication there is no true bridge mode. ATT is like that all they offer is IP Pass or DMZ mode. It's like a semi bridge mode but not a true bridge mode.
My AX56U automatically disable Runner with Qos Enabled.Asus RT-AX56U 384.16
View attachment 22734 View attachment 22735
It seems adaptive QoS is Hardware acceleration compatible, at least for 56U
My AX56U automatically disable Runner with Qos Enabled.
-QOS Enabled Runner: Disabled (QoS) - Flow Cache: Enabled
-QOS Disabled Runner: Enabled - Flow Cache: Enabled
Edit: I just tried Traditional QoS which appears to be able to limit download efficiently (2-8ms download bufferbloat and staying under the limit), upload bufferbloat still can't be limited (100ms average with 400ms spikes).
Adaptive QoS is not limiting download neither upload, I'll probably just stick with Traditional QoS.
Edit 2: I ran a dslreport test with sfq and traditional QoS and it scored A A A+, I ran the same the same test after 2 minutes and it scored B C A+.
I can't understand why traditional qos is so inconsistent, It cuts my download speed in half every 2 minutes
I came to post something similar to this with my new RT-AX58U (384.16).
I've not tried Traditional QoS yet, but adaptive seems to do nothing at all, and I get full download and upload speed no matter what the limits I have entered. I even dropped to 10%, and it still ran at full speed, and same behaviour for sfq and fq_codel.
I also see the same behaviour with Runner being disabled when QoS is enabled.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!