@Merlin Any idea why Asus did not include the speed test for the AX58U ?
Could be for performance reasons, or product differentiation between lower-end and higher-end models.
@Merlin Any idea why Asus did not include the speed test for the AX58U ?
@Merlin Any idea why Asus did not include the speed test for the AX58U ?
Dirty upgrade from 389.19 on RT-AX58U, all looks fine, thanks!
Router crashes and restarts when opening USB applications -> Servers Center.
Using only diversion.
Don't see the speedtest in Adaptive QoS https://www.snbforums.com/threads/t...s-testing-available-build-s.67101/post-631095
Interesting.. Did you Factory reset? I have always seen the Classifications.. I have a minor problem with the Gui on that page with Chrome but its fine in Edge (Chromium). The Speed test is there using the URL but like yours, it doesnt do anything except change to testing when you click the "Go" button
]
I thought that 36, 40, 44 and 48 are not DFS but UNII-1 channels. I didn't experience that delay with 384.19 and older on the same channels.This is normal. Check the Wireless Log status page, it will tell you it's currently doing DFS scanning.
Over in the ASUSWRT forums, RMerlin confirms he is still using the 40577 GPL.There are no public indications that Merlin has received any GPL source from Asus newer than 40577. So believe the changelog and Github and assume it’s still based on 40577.
I thought that 36, 40, 44 and 48 are not DFS but UNII-1 channels. I didn't experience that delay with 384.19 and older on the same channels.
I am facing this issue with Alpha3 on AX86U as well. Diversion wasnt about to install because of this problem. Any ideas?I can't install entware on ax86u alpha 3. it seems /opt is read only.
I am facing this issue with Alpha3 on AX86U as well. Diversion wasnt about to install because of this problem. Any ideas?
@RMerlin I'm running alpha 3 on my 5300. Everything seems okay but it seems to be missing the "Game" section that that 384.19.0 stable had. Did you purposely remove it or was that a change on Asus' side?
This is why I'm against these alpha threads. A lot of people dive in head first not realising just how deep and untested the waters are.... Then complain about it.Entware support is not implemented yet on the RT-AX86U.
This is a new model, support is still being gradually implemented, it's a work-in-progress.
Early development, I have not uniformized build profiles yet.
Folks, I cannot stress this enough. These are ALPHA builds. That means work in progress, a lot of things are still being actively implemented. So yes, expect things to not be done yet, this is normal. Until it reaches official beta stage, expect things to NOT fully be implemented yet.
I do have to say... Even as an alpha from Beta 386 RC2, @RMerlin still has the most stable firmware. Honestly, people could follow his commits on his github and see where he is at with everything before flashing to that next alpha release. If people cannot understand what is going on, they probably should wait till the final release before flashing.This is why I'm against these alpha threads. A lot of people dive in head first not realising just how deep and untested the waters are.... Then complain about it.
If you need every feature to "just work", DON'T USE ALPHA OR BETA FIRMWARE.
If you are happy for some things to potentially be broken or unstable, when a beta is released install that and join the testing effort.
Alpha stage releases have no testing, and reporting things not working isn't particularly helpful as RMerlin knows what does and doesn't work already during the alpha development.
/rant
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!