Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X SFP

[Trip]

Whether or not your WAN connection is hooked up via SFP or RJ45 (copper ethernet) has no bearing on compatibility between the ER and any switches or devices behind it. Two totally separate hookups. Now, if certain encapsulation and/or packet overheads are involved with that WAN connection, and you're potentially getting issues on egress traffic from LAN to WAN, you might have to adjust things like MTU, but that's more under the umbrella of addressable tweaks, than an out-and-out reason for all-or-nothing compatibility. Make sense?

 

[sfx2000]

A stupid question would that X-SFP worke with my Switches - Zyxel ES-108B V3, GS-108B V2, GS1100-16, and give maximum throughput through them as well, as they are Gb switches the answer must be YES?

Should be fine...

 

[pege63]

Whether or not your WAN connection is hooked up via SFP or RJ45 (copper ethernet) has no bearing on compatibility between the ER and any switches or devices behind it. Two totally separate hookups. Now, if certain encapsulation and/or packet overheads are involved with that WAN connection, and you're potentially getting issues on egress traffic from LAN to WAN, you might have to adjust things like MTU, but that's more under the umbrella of addressable tweaks, than an out-and-out reason for all-or-nothing compatibility. Make sense?

Yes, it makes sense, but I do not know where the bottleneck could be in the network, but i think its the Gateway..
As it is now, the fiber is connected to a media converter (CTS-HES 3108+) via SFP on top (IPTV, IPPhone, Internet).

Then the media converter (CTS-HES 3108+) is connected to the Technicolor TG799VAC (Red RJ45-Red RJ45)

The R7800 in AP mode is connected to LAN port on the Technicolor TG799VAC, One LAN port is connected to a 5 port Switch , the R7000 in AP mode is connected to the that switch.

The whole thing looks like this: