ntpmerlin will disable the firmware NTP server. So it's a known conflict identified today.Yes it appears to stick at first and then a couple of minutes later it goes back to 'No' (this is after hitting apply). I'm assuming whenever it goes back to 'No' unbound isn't working. I am also using ntpmerlin. Weird
I'd say its expected ;-)Yes it appears to stick at first and then a couple of minutes later it goes back to 'No' (this is after hitting apply). I'm assuming whenever it goes back to 'No' unbound isn't working. I am also using ntpmerlin. Weird
NTP_Firmware_Check(){
ENABLED_NTPD="$(nvram get ntpd_enable)"
if ! Validate_Number "" "$ENABLED_NTPD" "silent"; then ENABLED_NTPD=0; fi
if [ "$ENABLED_NTPD" -eq 1 ]; then
Print_Output "true" "Built-in ntpd is enabled and will conflict, it will be disabled" "$WARN"
nvram set ntpd_enable=0
nvram set ntpd_server_redir=0
nvram commit
service restart_time
service restart_firewall
return 1
else
return 0
fi
}
I was going to say, No, no problem on my RT-AC68U, but I double checked and that local BTP Server setting was back at No. i had no problem during the setting-up stage and no idea anything had changed. SoI called up unbound_mamager and invoked Option i again. The router pre-reqs test was all green.Is anyone having a problem with setting 'Enable local NTP server=YES' sticking? All other settings can be changed just fine, I keep notching this change to 'No' and then throw a warning in unbound manager.
AC68U
ntpmerlin uninstalled and the local ntp server setting now sticks at Yes.
@Marin I use OpenVPN while running Unbound on both routers I connect with. No issues at all.
However, I suspect you're asking about a commercial VPN service? I hope others can answer that for you soon.
RESOLVE: Cannot resolve host address: vpnserver-name:1215 (Name or service not known)
Could not determine IPv4/IPv6 protocol
I believe nobody is pixelserv and Diversion related, where did they go I don't know.Happened during simple install:
one of those on-the-fly creations.I'd say its expected ;-)
Code:NTP_Firmware_Check(){ ENABLED_NTPD="$(nvram get ntpd_enable)" if ! Validate_Number "" "$ENABLED_NTPD" "silent"; then ENABLED_NTPD=0; fi if [ "$ENABLED_NTPD" -eq 1 ]; then Print_Output "true" "Built-in ntpd is enabled and will conflict, it will be disabled" "$WARN" nvram set ntpd_enable=0 nvram set ntpd_server_redir=0 nvram commit service restart_time service restart_firewall return 1 else return 0 fi }
Indeed "nobody" is a "built in" pseudo user with (preferably) the least permission on the system. Running vulnerable services as nobody is a good idea, because the reduced rights on its own can already limit the scope of the of the security breach.I think 'nobody' is a Linux 'user' that has special powers and needed/required for certain scripts (I believe, for security).
Yes, I use NordVPN and was just wondering if anyone had any experiences to share yet. Was also thinking about attempting to take advantage of IPv6 with Unbound but then I found out that this is not possible with NordVPN just yet (although their FAQs state that it is slated for implementation later this year). So will stick with IPv4 for now and perhaps experiment with NordVPN and Unbound later this week to see how things go.
Hey my friend, I use Torguard and I have zero problems with unbound and OVPN clients. I haven't enabled my OVPN server yet though.Yes, I use NordVPN and was just wondering if anyone had any experiences to share yet. Was also thinking about attempting to take advantage of IPv6 with Unbound but then I found out that this is not possible with NordVPN just yet (although their FAQs state that it is slated for implementation later this year). So will stick with IPv4 for now and perhaps experiment with NordVPN and Unbound later this week to see how things go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You'll have to Accept DNS Configuration = Exclusive in the OpenVPN Client screen to use NordVPN DNS. You can use unbound over the OpenVPN tunnel by setting Accept DNS Configuration = Disabled. But since NordVPN uses their DNS as a proxy, you won't be able to stream using the tunnel. You can still use unbound for any traffic you route to the WAN.I'm using NordVPN on two VPN clients running simultaneous connections to different servers. When I get home tomorrow, I will test Unbound and see how it goes, as I've been interested in this project for a while. Any issues, I'll probably be posting up here for help anyway!
The only problem I can foresee is potentially breaking how NordVPN's proxy DNS works, which I believe they use in order to circumvent the geo-blocks services like Netflix use.
I use accept dns config disabled and then use dnsfilter to designate what dns I want in the tunnel. I need cloudflare so I use 1.1.1.1 in the custom 1 field of dnsfilter and it works awesome.You'll have to Accept DNS Configuration = Exclusive in the OpenVPN Client screen. You can still use unbound over the tunnel by setting Accept DNS Configuration = Disabled. But since NordVPN uses their DNS as a proxy, you won't be able to stream using the tunnel. You can still use unbound for any traffic you route to the WAN.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!