FlexQoS FlexQoS 1.2.4 - Flexible QoS Enhancement Script for Adaptive QoS

[Vexira]

Hi Dave if you don't mind me asking is it possible in a future update to allow us to switch between dev and stable form the GUI?

Or is that too much of a silly idea and I should go back to the darkness form which I came.

 

[L&LD]

@Jack Yaz, @Martineau, @thelonelycoder, @dave14305, @Vexira, I would love that option too.

 

[Jack Yaz]

@Jack Yaz, @Martineau, @thelonelycoder, @dave14305, @Vexira, I would love that option too.

No because develop is often broken (for me anyway, since I use it as my development branch) and I don't want users switching to it too easily and complaining things are broken.

 

[raion969]

just wanted to know if the bandwith montior priority settings are still broken? So let all to be default ?

 

[L&LD]

@Jack Yaz, I knew that would be the main reason against it, but it was worth a try.

 

[dave14305]

Hi guys.
My question is:
With fq_codel active,
accelerated nat must be on or off?
Thanks.
Good night from Italy

There's no need to change the acceleration settings, as far as I know. Ciao.

 

[dave14305]

Total rookie on flexQOS

I'm getting this is the System Log approx. every 5 minutes

Jan 18 12:18:00 FlexQoS: /jffs/addons/flexqos/flexqos.sh (pid=16740) called in unattended mode with 1 args: -check
Jan 18 12:18:00 FlexQoS: iptables rules already present
Jan 18 12:18:01 FlexQoS: Applying AppDB rules and TC rates
Jan 18 12:18:01 FlexQoS: ERROR! Check /tmp/flexqos_tcrules.log

/tmp/flexqos_tcrules.log shows

Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:16" is unparsable
Command failed /tmp/flexqos_tcrules:18
Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:15" is unparsable
Command failed /tmp/flexqos_tcrules:34

/tmp/flexqos_tcrules is attached


I haven't set up any custom rules. This error seems to come up much more often when the guest network is enabled. Just started using the guest network recently as we have guests now . I don't remember seeing that entry in the system log before we started using the guest network.

Anything to worry about here?

This is interesting. Please post the output of flexqos debug and tc filter show dev eth0
One of your appdb rules is not correctly finding the existing filter handle correctly.

 

[dave14305]

1.1.1 Dev
Something Is wrongView attachment 29665oView attachment 29664

Please post the output of flexqos debug and iptables -t mangle -nvL FlexQoS

 

[dave14305]

Hi Dave if you don't mind me asking is it possible in a future update to allow us to switch between dev and stable form the GUI?

I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.

 

[dave14305]

just wanted to know if the bandwith montior priority settings are still broken? So let all to be default ?

I don't think it was ever intended to work with Adaptive QoS (only Traditional QoS). But I'm not 100% certain.

 

[Jack Yaz]

I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.

I move users back automatically by leaving the "branch" variable set as "master" on my develop branch when I'm ready to merge things. The branches will usually sit equal until I start development on the script again when I'll reset it to develop.

 

[Vexira]

I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.

I guess If it came with a experimental features may break things warning, use at your own risk.

 

[BoostOver]

Please post the output of flexqos debug and iptables -t mangle -nvL FlexQoS

The problem disappeared.

 

[BoostOver]

"With the game in mind"
I don't know much about internet protocols, but:
Don't you think it's insane to prioritize a console (besides all, all traffic) at the "Net control Packets" level like "Gear Accelerator" does?
Thanks.

 

[Vexira]

@dave14305 the new dev branch fq qodel seems to be doing wonders for my network seem that so far most of my network based applications are significantly more responsive so I'm happy.

 

[dave14305]

Don't you think it's insane to prioritize a console (besides all, all traffic) at the "Net control Packets" level like "Gear Accelerator" does?

Yes.

 

[DanNuke86]

Dave, I’ve not managed to replicate the issue I had earlier this week although I’ve been busy with work this week so haven’t had much chance to test, but will be over the next couple of days. What’s the best way to compare stats between stable/develop branches rather than just the ‘feel’ for it? Any advice on what kind of things to look out for?

 

[Treadler]

@dave14305 the new dev branch fq qodel seems to be doing wonders for my network seem that so far most of my network based applications are significantly more responsive so I'm happy.

+1, very happy here!

 

[pattiri]

I'm also a fan of dev branch fq codel!

My speed is 100/5 but between 19:00-00:00 it's 25/5. That's why I'm using automatic BW mode and even with this settings I got all "A" via dslreports doesn't matter what time it is.

Thank you and great work!!!

 

[chris.at]

After several days with lots of traffic competing in work-from-home class I can confirm that this new dev version with fq_codel works perfectly. Thank you for your great work dave!