No because develop is often broken (for me anyway, since I use it as my development branch) and I don't want users switching to it too easily and complaining things are broken.
There's no need to change the acceleration settings, as far as I know. Ciao.Hi guys.
My question is:
With fq_codel active,
accelerated nat must be on or off?
Thanks.
Good night from Italy
This is interesting. Please post the output ofTotal rookie on flexQOS
I'm getting this is the System Log approx. every 5 minutes
Jan 18 12:18:00 FlexQoS: /jffs/addons/flexqos/flexqos.sh (pid=16740) called in unattended mode with 1 args: -check
Jan 18 12:18:00 FlexQoS: iptables rules already present
Jan 18 12:18:01 FlexQoS: Applying AppDB rules and TC rates
Jan 18 12:18:01 FlexQoS: ERROR! Check /tmp/flexqos_tcrules.log
/tmp/flexqos_tcrules.log shows
Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:16" is unparsable
Command failed /tmp/flexqos_tcrules:18
Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:15" is unparsable
Command failed /tmp/flexqos_tcrules:34
/tmp/flexqos_tcrules is attached
I haven't set up any custom rules. This error seems to come up much more often when the guest network is enabled. Just started using the guest network recently as we have guests now . I don't remember seeing that entry in the system log before we started using the guest network.
Anything to worry about here?
flexqos debug
and tc filter show dev eth0
Please post the output of
flexqos debug
and iptables -t mangle -nvL FlexQoS
I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.Hi Dave if you don't mind me asking is it possible in a future update to allow us to switch between dev and stable form the GUI?
I don't think it was ever intended to work with Adaptive QoS (only Traditional QoS). But I'm not 100% certain.just wanted to know if the bandwith montior priority settings are still broken? So let all to be default ?
I move users back automatically by leaving the "branch" variable set as "master" on my develop branch when I'm ready to merge things. The branches will usually sit equal until I start development on the script again when I'll reset it to develop.I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.
I guess If it came with a experimental features may break things warning, use at your own risk.I might consider an option to switch from develop to stable via the GUI, since it's moving a user toward a safer, more stable release. Switching to develop is a risky proposition, and beyond many users' appetites for risk, so the inconvenience of having to switch at the command line is a safety feature.
The problem disappeared.Please post the output offlexqos debug
andiptables -t mangle -nvL FlexQoS
Yes.Don't you think it's insane to prioritize a console (besides all, all traffic) at the "Net control Packets" level like "Gear Accelerator" does?
@dave14305 the new dev branch fq qodel seems to be doing wonders for my network seem that so far most of my network based applications are significantly more responsive so I'm happy.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!