I ll give it a try this this week-end(will flash it when back from job).I am one of those with this problem.
Any timeline to have a release compatible with RT-AC5300? Thanks
In my opinion both are valid (more or less). The 380.61_alpha1 seems have WiFi more stable and the GUI faster.Comparing 380.60Beta2 and 380.61Alpha1, which one seems to have less issues or is more stable overall?
In my opinion both are valid (more or less). The 380.61_alpha1 seems have WiFi more stable and the GUI faster.
At the moment I prefer 380.61...
Cool! I just flashed my router with 380.61 alpha 1, it does have way faster GUI. I will update some more information.Running the Alpha 1, 380.61 here good so far
On overnight so far
Hope that model gets support soonCant wait for RT_AC88U support
What WAN problems do/did you have? I had a WAN problem on 380.59, it said disconnected on GUI interface, but I could access some of the websites, like 50% of them. I had to restart the router to get it to work again. Is that the same problem with you?I wish in this version no more wan disconnectivity problems...but have to wait feedback from others who had same wan problems as me...
sent from Kodi 17 Krypton
no, i have this errors on 380.60 firmware....at the moment i use 380.57...What WAN problems do/did you have? I had a WAN problem on 380.59, it said disconnected on GUI interface, but I could access some of the websites, like 50% of them. I had to restart the router to get it to work again. Is that the same problem with you?
Jul 18 18:54:15 WAN Connection: ISP's DHCP did not function properly.
Jul 18 18:54:15 DualWAN: skip single wan wan_led_control - WANRED off
Jul 18 18:55:19 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
14:18:24 pppd[515]: No response to 10 echo-requests
14:18:24 pppd[515]: Serial link appears to be disconnected.
14:18:24 pppd[515]: Connect time 1262.9 minutes.
14:18:24 pppd[515]: Sent 402579779 bytes, received 3156443671 bytes.
14:18:28 WAN Connection: Fail to connect with some issues.
14:18:30 pppd[515]: Connection terminated.
14:18:30 pppd[515]: Sent PADT
14:18:30 pppd[515]: Modem hangup
14:19:15 pppd[515]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
14:20:30 pppd[515]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
14:21:45 pppd[515]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
14:23:00 pppd[515]: Timeout waiting for PADO packets
14:23:01 pppd[515]: PPP session is 24093 (0x5e1d)
14:23:01 pppd[515]: Connected to 00:30:88:19:c3:bb via interface eth0
14:23:01 pppd[515]: Using interface ppp0
14:23:01 pppd[515]: Connect: ppp0 <--> eth0
Didn't have WAN problem with previous firmwares and now, just an observation, the WAN DHCP is steadier with the IP it acquires now, before when 68U were rebooted it will get new IP's almost everytime, it so it seems there is an automatic MAC cloning happening therefore acquiring different IP's from the ISP.RT-AC68U owners, any of you used to be on 380.60 beta, and used to have WAN-related issues? Are these fixed so far in 380.61 alpha 1 ?
I wish in this version no more wan disconnectivity problems...but have to wait feedback from others who had same wan problems as me....and also there is no firmware yet for my router....will wait...
sent from Kodi 17 Krypton
Didn't have WAN problem with previous firmwares and now, just an observation, the WAN DHCP is steadier with the IP it acquires now, before when 68U were rebooted it will get new IP's almost everytime, it so it seems there is an automatic MAC cloning happening therefore acquiring different IP's from the ISP.
yes i know that everyone have to test firmware and write feedback but i am waiting firmware for my router....there are just three routers support for now....The goal of a beta/alpha version is to generate feedback. If you do have that issue, then it would be helpful for you to test it. Waiting for others to test it means that a specific issue might never get tested at all if everyone were to also wait for others to do so.
The goal of a beta/alpha version is to generate feedback. If you do have that issue, then it would be helpful for you to test it. Waiting for others to test it means that a specific issue might never get tested at all if everyone were to also wait for others to do so.
[...]
I suspect that the WAN issues a few users experienced with 380.60 were in the wanduck code. Wanduck is a process that handles the WAN state, detecting if it went down, if it's currently connecting, failing to connect, etc... Asus did a lot of changes recently to that code, and I'm hoping that the changes they did in 3831 (used by 380.61) resolved the issues that were introduced in 380.60 (the 3200-3400 Asus code).
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!