Beta Asus RT-AX89X_9.0.0.4_388_31185 Beta

[ben29]

The original firmware has an issue with the 5ghz-2 of the nodes. That’s no option for me. So I’m gonna stay with the 32094. or the 32039 for the dual wan option, if no one has an Idea.

388.32094 is the last beta?

 

[ommi]

.32100 last beta

 

[ben29]

.32100 last beta

Download link pls?

 

[ommi]

https://tinyurl.com/b5yx2678

 

[ben29]

it will be posible to revert to orginial firmware?

 

[ben29]

https://tinyurl.com/b5yx2678

and how you mange to get the firmware?

 

[ommi]

Typical installation

 

[ben29]

Which mean positive to restore ?

 

[ben29]

how did you get the firmware beta files?

 

[ieatsoop]

how did you get the firmware beta files?

From an earlier post on this thread:

Beta - Asus RT-AX89X_9.0.0.4_388_31185 Beta

I got it from one of the developers. They don't want to share it publicly. They will only publish the final release as soon as it is ready. I'm not yet on the beta (I had no time yet) but I'm affected by the issue this morning (CEST) as well. so thanks for the tip on how to delete this file. I'm...

www.snbforums.com

 

[Tim Boening]

Is anyone having issues with 2ghz constantly dropping in which requires a reboot of the router while using firmware version: RT-AX89X : 9.0.0.4.388_32100-gd2badf4?
Rebooting the router every 12 hours is getting a little ridiculous!

 

[L&LD]

You're running Beta firmware. What have you done to isolate this issue?

 

[Yakkosmurf]

Is anyone having issues with 2ghz constantly dropping in which requires a reboot of the router while using firmware version: RT-AX89X : 9.0.0.4.388_32100-gd2badf4?
Rebooting the router every 12 hours is getting a little ridiculous!

No issues with that. I'm on that firmware version with about a dozen 2.4 GHz clients. I haven't noticed anything.

Can you be a little more specific about the signature?

 

[ben29]

There is new beta?

 

[TAGTRAUM]

There is new beta?

Can you stop spamming here for new firmware, thanks

 

[Yakkosmurf]

So far, the current beta is working well for me. Not sure what else needs to change that people are looking for a newer version. I've not had any lockups or reboots since going to 32100. My 50-something clients are attaching to my mesh network as expected. Memory usage percentage is stable in the mid-50s. CPU cores are usually running below 20% during non-dynamic operations.

 

[Marcus2302]

So far, the current beta is working well for me. Not sure what else needs to change that people are looking for a newer version. I've not had any lockups or reboots since going to 32100. My 50-something clients are attaching to my mesh network as expected. Memory usage percentage is stable in the mid-50s. CPU cores are usually running below 20% during non-dynamic operations.

what kind of mesh system are you using? I have an x89x as main unit and two xt8 and for me it’s not working very well.

 

[Yakkosmurf]

what kind of mesh system are you using? I have an x89x as main unit and two xt8 and for me it’s not working very well.

I have an AX89X as the main router with 4 nodes. 2 of the nodes are AX88Us and the other 2 are AX58Us. They are all connected with a wired backhaul.

 

[wallyg8r]

Has anyone else had an issue with beta RT-AX89X : 9.0.0.4.388_32100-gd2badf4? where changes under the wireless/professional tab are not saving? Also, while talking on the phone with Asus today, I was told that a beta didn't exist!

 

[Marcus2302]

I have an AX89X as the main router with 4 nodes. 2 of the nodes are AX88Us and the other 2 are AX58Us. They are all connected with a wired backhaul.

Ok thank you. That’s strange. I’m using a wired backhaul, too. I’ve tried several firmware combinations of the xt8 with the new ax98x firmware without success. The last working with dual wan is the 32039. maybe the TRI band of the xt8 or the 2,5 gig connection will cause the problem. Has anyone else an issue with the nodes?