Thanks, I'll have a look at them.P.S. I'm off to bed. Will continue troubleshooting when I can.
Can you tell me if you are using the 2.5 Gbps or a 10 Gbps WAN port?
Thanks, I'll have a look at them.P.S. I'm off to bed. Will continue troubleshooting when I can.
Thanks, I'll have a look at them.
Can you tell me if you are using the 2.5 Gbps or a 10 Gbps WAN port?
Ok thanks. Checking with Asus' engineers in case they might have an idea (it was one of their questions).2.5Gbps port for WAN.
2 computers with 2.5G ports using the 10G ports.
AT&T FIBER — INTERNET 2000
If your router gets in a boot loop, try unplugging the WAN and see if you are able to let it boot properly without having to reset it. If it does, it might at least let you re-disable AiProtection before you plug it back.2.5Gbps port for WAN.
2 computers with 2.5G ports using the 10G ports.
AT&T FIBER — INTERNET 2000
fc disable
cat /proc/net/biqos
I had these too after upgrading to the beta. Turned off smart connect and solved.AX86U: Dirty upgrade from 386.7_2 to 388.1-beta 1.
Everything runs smooth, the only thing I have are some strange lines in the log file:
Nov 8 07:30:39 bsd: bsd: Sending act Frame to 34:79:16:XX:XX:XX with transition target eth6 ssid 7c:10:c9:XX:XX:XX
Nov 8 07:30:40 bsd: bsd: STA:34:79:16:XX:XX:XX no response
Nov 8 07:30:40 bsd: bsd: Sending act Frame to 34:79:16:XX:XX:XX with transition target eth6 ssid 7c:10:c9:XX:XX:XX
Nov 8 07:30:40 bsd: bsd: BSS Transit Response: ifname=eth7, event=156, token=2, status=7, mac=00:00:00:00:00:00
Nov 8 07:30:40 bsd: bsd: BSS Transit Response: STA reject
Nov 8 07:30:40 bsd: bsd: Skip STA:34:79:16:XX:XX:XX reject BSSID
I've tried to google the error as I am not the expert (without result), any idea what this could be?
I found it's (SmartConnect), more trouble than it's worth also.I had these too after upgrading to the beta. Turned off smart connect and solved.
I don’t really see a difference with smartconnect on or off so I just left it off.
hope this helps.
I like having my WiFi configuration on 1 page as with SmartConnect... why do you believe it is more trouble than it's worth?I found it's (SmartConnect), more trouble than it's worth also.
I find it connects some of my devices to 2.4g when they run very well on 5g. This can be managed for the most part, but it takes lots of patience to fuss with the settings, on a continual basis. I just think separate bands are easier to manage over all.I like having my WiFi configuration on 1 page as with SmartConnect... why do you believe it is more trouble than it's worth?
You should do more reading, or use the search tool. This has been discussed at length in previous posts in this thread. NAT acceleration is not compatible with this Wireguard implementation at this point. It may stay that way as well.Can someone with better network-smarts than me explain why Wireguard requires NAT-acceleration, and why Asus doesn't have it enabled? Can it be enabled later? Seems weird to offer a throttled Wireguard.
From RMerlin:Can someone with better network-smarts than me explain why Wireguard requires NAT-acceleration, and why Asus doesn't have it enabled? Can it be enabled later? Seems weird to offer a throttled Wireguard.
The problem is the Wireguard protocol is not compatible with Broadcom Flow Cache (part of their NAT acceleration). That requires you to disable NAT acceleration to be able to use Wireguard, which will cap NAT throughput at around 300-350 Mbps max on an RT-AX88U (and that's without any VPN overhead). Whatever speed gain Wireguard might get, you end up being capped at around 300 Mbps, which isn't much faster than OpenVPN which can reach 220-250 Mbps on the same router. OpenVPN can run with Flow Cache still enabled, so that means anyone with an Internet connection faster than 300 Mbps cannot use Wireguard without seriously capping their whole Internet connection speed.
Very kind of you, Thanks! DFS is also a concern to me, as my location is very near a waypoint for Pearson airspace, as well as Hamilton Munro.Not this beta related but may help you - I've got one AX86S for a friend of mine for CAD180 about a month back. It was CAD200 last week at BestBuy. The U and S versions perform exactly the same, if you don't hit the obvious S limitations. I've tested both side by side on my home 500/30 cable. Both perform worse than AC86U on lower 36-48 channels, good on 149-161. I don't know about DFS range, too close to Pearson International flight path.
Too many models to support, so I have to chose. That model's market share is limited, and its lack of USB ports makes Asuswrt-Merlin much less useful for it.Thank you for the work!
Just curious ... why is the ZenWifi ET12 not supported?
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!