spdMerlin spdMerlin - v4.x - speedtest and bandwidth monitoring

[Jack Yaz]

Ran speedtest and no spdmerlin.d folder still within share folder.

wondering if you'd be interested in letting me connect in with teamviewer or something to poke around. it's bugging me that this isn't working for you

 

[Swinson]

Might be on to something there....didn't see any updates but when forced it looks as though it did.
View attachment 27905

I believe that’s always the output but I’m not sure.
You can always do it through opkg and force options on individual packages.

Something like this should force an update like “uf” in AMTM

opkg update && opkg upgrade --force-reinstall

 

[juched]

Perhaps a small issue. When I ran this in UI mode manually, it recorded the upload size in the download section, and nothing for download (which was 1.4GB).

 

[Jack Yaz]

Perhaps a small issue. When I ran this in UI mode manually, it recorded the upload size in the download section, and nothing for download (which was 1.4GB).

View attachment 27907

do you happen to have a copy of the text output please?

 

[juched]

do you happen to have a copy of the text output please?

 

[Jack Yaz]

View attachment 27909

View attachment 27910

can you check how it's recorded in the db itself? this might be the function that parses the db to arrays for the table going a bit wrong

sqlite3 /opt/share/spdmerlin.d/spdstats.db
.headers on
select * from spdstats_WAN order by Timestamp desc limit 10;

 

[juched]

can you check how it's recorded in the db itself? this might be the function that parses the db to arrays for the table going a bit wrong

sqlite3 /opt/share/spdmerlin.d/spdstats.db
.headers on
select * from spdstats_WAN order by Timestamp desc limit 10;

looks good in db

 

[Jack Yaz]

looks good in db

View attachment 27914

Ah i see you have result url off, i can test if there's a bug there

 

[Jack Yaz]

Ah i see you have result url off, i can test if there's a bug there

@juched develop branch has a fix
Next up, GB parsing!

 

[Jack Yaz]

@juched @Slawek P develop has an improvement if data used is in the GB range. I can't test this since my paltry 550Mbps doesn't use over 1GB, so feedback required! The script checks if the data used is reported as GB and stores the value multiplied by 1024

 

[QuikSilver]

wondering if you'd be interested in letting me connect in with teamviewer or something to poke around. it's bugging me that this isn't working for you

Message sent...check DM

 

[QuikSilver]

So...did the same stuff on my main router, and it does the same. Loads fine initially, chose option a) AutoBW, then back and get "grep: /jffs/addons/spdmerlin.d/config: No such file or directory" scattered throughout.

 

[Jack Yaz]

So...did the same stuff on my main router, and it does the same. Loads fine initially, chose option a) AutoBW, then back and get "grep: /jffs/addons/spdmerlin.d/config: No such file or directory" scattered throughout.

@RMerlin are you aware of anything in 386 from Asus that would meddle with any files named "config" in jffs? We've got this solved (for now) by moving the config etc. to USB. even manually creating an empty file named config would see it disappear right before our eyes after a couple of seconds!

 

[RMerlin]

@RMerlin are you aware of anything in 386 from Asus that would meddle with any files named "config" in jffs? We've got this solved (for now) by moving the config etc. to USB. even manually creating an empty file named config would see it disappear right before our eyes after a couple of seconds!

If it disappears after a few seconds then that would be from their new security daemon. Which is odd since it shouldn't be messing with the addons sub-directory AFAIK, unless they forgot to exclude it.

 

[QuikSilver]

If it disappears after a few seconds then that would be from their new security daemon. Which is odd since it shouldn't be messing with the addons sub-directory AFAIK, unless they forgot to exclude it.

Does it work searching for certain keyword names like config? "Newfile" was created and its still there.

 

[juched]

@juched @Slawek P develop has an improvement if data used is in the GB range. I can't test this since my paltry 550Mbps doesn't use over 1GB, so feedback required! The script checks if the data used is reported as GB and stores the value multiplied by 1024

Well, it displays now, but doesn't show the real size.

Edit: played around with the AWK, think you want this:

 

[RMerlin]

Does it work searching for certain keyword names like config? "Newfile" was created and its still there.

Yes, it's filename-based.

 

[juched]

Well, it displays now, but doesn't show the real size.

View attachment 27920

View attachment 27921


Edit: played around with the AWK, think you want this:

View attachment 27922

Sorry, not $9, but $7 was right... my test file was wrong.

But with the substr to strip off the ending ), it works!

 

[Slawek P]

@juched @Slawek P develop has an improvement if data used is in the GB range. I can't test this since my paltry 550Mbps doesn't use over 1GB, so feedback required! The script checks if the data used is reported as GB and stores the value multiplied by 1024

Morning. Not quite there yet. This is what I have got on develop 4.0.1, recent changes do not play well together.
Data used still does not appear in gigabytes, but packet loss info now disappears. Tried both with and without result url storing.

 

[Jack Yaz]

Morning. Not quite there yet. This is what I have got on develop 4.0.1, recent changes do not play well together.
Data used still does not appear in gigabytes, but packet loss info now disappears. Tried both with and without result url storing.
View attachment 27926

Packet loss is server dependent... If you're using auto select there's a chance it will use one that doesn't support it.

The packet loss question is annoying me already. This is what I get for bowing to user requests