ramblefish
New Around Here
Hi. Please tell me how to go with the latest version of the firmware oreginalnoy 3.0.0.4.380.4005 for your 380.63.2 firmware? Do I need to be cleaned before flashing NVRAM? Router ASUS RT-AC66U revision B0.
The proper way to eliminate the possibility that it's the ISP would be to try the router at a friends' place who has a different ISp.I thought that at first but disabling TA helped for a little bit but now the problem is nearly as bad before. If it was an ISP I would have expected the problem to be persistent regardless of any of my attempts to resolve it.
After I disabled the notification for 10 days without a reboot. Everything else in AiProtection included. Firmware Merlin 380.63_2. Before upgrading to 380.63_1 doing a hard reset, and then set up all hands, without the restoration of the config. After that restart proceeded to turn off notifications. Most have not changed anything in the settings.Tried disabling the ai alert but no appreciable difference on ac87u. Still having reboot issues. Have downgraded to 380.62 and I have my reliable router back. No rebooting or disconnecting for 48 hours and clean log. Fingers crossed. Hope Asus / merlin (though I think it's an Asus issue rather than merlin) figure out whats wrong.
No, sorry. That's for use in postconf scripts to delete a line from the router generated conf files.
dnsmasq[29984]: started, version 2.76 cachesize 1500
Nov 29 18:03:53 dnsmasq[29984]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-RTC no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset no-auth DNSSEC loop-detect no-inotify
Did I miss that before or is Dnsmasq more verbose at startup / restart?Code:dnsmasq[29984]: started, version 2.76 cachesize 1500 Nov 29 18:03:53 dnsmasq[29984]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-RTC no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset no-auth DNSSEC loop-detect no-inotify
Also, on that router IPv6 is disabled, no DNSSEC activated.
OK, I'll have to look through the (new) Dnmasq options. There might be some benefits for AB buried in it.Those are build-time features (notice the "compile time options" part), not run-time settings. It means this dnsmasq binary has dnssec support, but it's up to you to enable or disable it.
OK, I'll have to look through the (new) Dnmasq options. There might be some benefits for AB buried in it.
I have only one tiny issue with my RT-AC87U. I can't use the webUI to update the firmware and instead have to do it manually flash using mtd_write2 since 380.63 for some unknown reason.Haven't had any issues with 87U and 380.63_2. I've got an uptime of over 15 days, no drop outs, able to stream hours of Netflix, movies, music no problems.
Nov 29 15:50:18 kernel: Interface wifi0 doesn't exist
I am seeing the following entry in my system log:
Is this something I should worry about? My router seems to be running without any issues.
Hi,I have only one tiny issue with my RT-AC87U. I can't use the webUI to update the firmware and instead have to do it manually flash using mtd_write2 since 380.63 for some unknown reason.
Those are the idle values, not the nic.My RT-AC68U with 380.63_0 showed high CPU usage for nic on one processor, so I upgraded to 380.63_2.
Now I get confusing results. Webui shows 0-2% CPU load on both processors, while TOP shows:
Mem: 82520K used, 173180K free, 0K shrd, 3356K buff, 23940K cached
CPU0: 0.1% usr 0.1% sys 0.0% nic 99.6% idle 0.0% io 0.0% irq 0.0% sirq
CPU1: 1.5% usr 0.7% sys 0.0% nic 97.0% idle 0.0% io 0.0% irq 0.5% sirq
Load average: 0.15 0.34 0.19 1/91 1461
What does it mean, when nic shows 98-100% CPU load?
Now, after the upgrade, it is both nic's that show high CPU.
Before the upgrade, it was only one nic that show high CPU, while the other was more or less idle.
Should I be worried?
My RT-AC68U with 380.63_0 showed high CPU usage for nic on one processor, so I upgraded to 380.63_2.
Now I get confusing results. Webui shows 0-2% CPU load on both processors, while TOP shows:
Mem: 82520K used, 173180K free, 0K shrd, 3356K buff, 23940K cached
CPU0: 0.1% usr 0.1% sys 0.0% nic 99.6% idle 0.0% io 0.0% irq 0.0% sirq
CPU1: 1.5% usr 0.7% sys 0.0% nic 97.0% idle 0.0% io 0.0% irq 0.5% sirq
Load average: 0.15 0.34 0.19 1/91 1461
What does it mean, when nic shows 98-100% CPU load?
Now, after the upgrade, it is both nic's that show high CPU.
Before the upgrade, it was only one nic that show high CPU, while the other was more or less idle.
Should I be worried?
You are right: I read it backwards.Those are the idle values, not the nic.
% than the service being monitored. I've been bit by that too in the past.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!